Groß, Kerstin ; Adamy, Jürgen (2012)
Comparison of LLRF Control Approaches for High Intensity Hadron Synchrotrons: Design and Performance.
3rd International Particle Accelerator Conference 2012. New Orleans, USA (20.05.2012-25.05.2012)
Konferenzveröffentlichung, Bibliographie
Dies ist die neueste Version dieses Eintrags.
Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract)
A usual and effective way to realize closed-loop con- trollers is to use cascaded SISO feedback and to rely on some kind of linear PID (proportional, integral, derivative) structure often with parameters adjusted manually. Such a control may not reach optimal performance if the system is coupled or non-linear. Regarding intense beams, longitudi- nal beam loading can be compensated by detuning. But the coupling between phase and amplitude (or I and Q compo- nent) highly depends on the tuning, that is on the resonant frequency of the cavity. It is derived that cavity and beam dynamics show bi-linear nature, i.e. belong to a well inves- tigated class of non-linear systems with appropriate control strategies available [1, 4]. Different controller designs are compared. The perfor- mance evaluation is based on macro-particle tracking sim- ulations.
Typ des Eintrags: | Konferenzveröffentlichung |
---|---|
Erschienen: | 2012 |
Autor(en): | Groß, Kerstin ; Adamy, Jürgen |
Art des Eintrags: | Bibliographie |
Titel: | Comparison of LLRF Control Approaches for High Intensity Hadron Synchrotrons: Design and Performance |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Publikationsjahr: | 21 Mai 2012 |
Buchtitel: | Proceedings of IPAC2012 |
Veranstaltungstitel: | 3rd International Particle Accelerator Conference 2012 |
Veranstaltungsort: | New Orleans, USA |
Veranstaltungsdatum: | 20.05.2012-25.05.2012 |
URL / URN: | https://accelconf.web.cern.ch/IPAC2012/html/class.htm |
Zugehörige Links: | |
Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract): | A usual and effective way to realize closed-loop con- trollers is to use cascaded SISO feedback and to rely on some kind of linear PID (proportional, integral, derivative) structure often with parameters adjusted manually. Such a control may not reach optimal performance if the system is coupled or non-linear. Regarding intense beams, longitudi- nal beam loading can be compensated by detuning. But the coupling between phase and amplitude (or I and Q compo- nent) highly depends on the tuning, that is on the resonant frequency of the cavity. It is derived that cavity and beam dynamics show bi-linear nature, i.e. belong to a well inves- tigated class of non-linear systems with appropriate control strategies available [1, 4]. Different controller designs are compared. The perfor- mance evaluation is based on macro-particle tracking sim- ulations. |
Zusätzliche Informationen: | 07 Accelerator Technology and Main Systems T27 Low Level RF |
Fachbereich(e)/-gebiet(e): | 18 Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik 18 Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik > Institut für Automatisierungstechnik und Mechatronik 18 Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik > Institut für Automatisierungstechnik und Mechatronik > Regelungsmethoden und Robotik (ab 01.08.2022 umbenannt in Regelungsmethoden und Intelligente Systeme) |
Hinterlegungsdatum: | 27 Aug 2012 13:47 |
Letzte Änderung: | 03 Jul 2024 02:20 |
PPN: | |
Export: | |
Suche nach Titel in: | TUfind oder in Google |
Verfügbare Versionen dieses Eintrags
-
Comparison of LLRF Control Approaches for High Intensity Hadron Synchrotrons: Design and Performance. (deposited 21 Jan 2022 08:06)
- Comparison of LLRF Control Approaches for High Intensity Hadron Synchrotrons: Design and Performance. (deposited 27 Aug 2012 13:47) [Gegenwärtig angezeigt]
Frage zum Eintrag |
Optionen (nur für Redakteure)
Redaktionelle Details anzeigen |