Kollegger, Gerrit ; Wiemeyer, Josef ; Ewerton, Marco ; Peters, Jan (2021)
Perception and prediction of the putting distance of robot putting movements under different visual/viewing conditions.
In: PLOS ONE, 16 (4)
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249518
Artikel, Bibliographie
Dies ist die neueste Version dieses Eintrags.
Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract)
The purpose of this paper is to examine, whether and under which conditions humans are able to predict the putting distance of a robotic device. Based on the “flash-lag effect” (FLE) it was expected that the prediction errors increase with increasing putting velocity. Furthermore, we hypothesized that the predictions are more accurate and more confident if human observers operate under full vision (F-RCHB) compared to either temporal occlusion (IRCHB) or spatial occlusion (invisible ball, F-RHC, or club, F-B). In two experiments, 48 video sequences of putt movements performed by a BioRob robot arm were presented to thirty-nine students (age: 24.49±3.20 years). In the experiments, video sequences included six putting distances (1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, and 4.0 m; experiment 1) under full versus incomplete vision (F-RCHB versus I-RCHB) and three putting distances (2. 0, 3.0, and 4.0 m; experiment 2) under the four visual conditions (F-RCHB, I-RCHB, F-RCH, and F-B). After the presentation of each video sequence, the participants estimated the putting distance on a scale from 0 to 6 m and provided their confidence of prediction on a 5-point scale. Both experiments show comparable results for the respective dependent variables (error and confidence measures). The participants consistently overestimated the putting distance under the full vision conditions; however, the experiments did not show a pattern that was consistent with the FLE. Under the temporal occlusion condition, a prediction was not possible; rather a random estimation pattern was found around the centre of the prediction scale (3 m). Spatial occlusion did not affect errors and confidence of prediction. The experiments indicate that temporal constraints seem to be more critical than spatial constraints. The FLE may not apply to distance prediction compared to location estimation.
| Typ des Eintrags: | Artikel |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: | 2021 |
| Autor(en): | Kollegger, Gerrit ; Wiemeyer, Josef ; Ewerton, Marco ; Peters, Jan |
| Art des Eintrags: | Bibliographie |
| Titel: | Perception and prediction of the putting distance of robot putting movements under different visual/viewing conditions |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Publikationsjahr: | 2021 |
| Verlag: | PLOS |
| Titel der Zeitschrift, Zeitung oder Schriftenreihe: | PLOS ONE |
| Jahrgang/Volume einer Zeitschrift: | 16 |
| (Heft-)Nummer: | 4 |
| Kollation: | 31 Seiten |
| DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0249518 |
| Zugehörige Links: | |
| Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract): | The purpose of this paper is to examine, whether and under which conditions humans are able to predict the putting distance of a robotic device. Based on the “flash-lag effect” (FLE) it was expected that the prediction errors increase with increasing putting velocity. Furthermore, we hypothesized that the predictions are more accurate and more confident if human observers operate under full vision (F-RCHB) compared to either temporal occlusion (IRCHB) or spatial occlusion (invisible ball, F-RHC, or club, F-B). In two experiments, 48 video sequences of putt movements performed by a BioRob robot arm were presented to thirty-nine students (age: 24.49±3.20 years). In the experiments, video sequences included six putting distances (1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, and 4.0 m; experiment 1) under full versus incomplete vision (F-RCHB versus I-RCHB) and three putting distances (2. 0, 3.0, and 4.0 m; experiment 2) under the four visual conditions (F-RCHB, I-RCHB, F-RCH, and F-B). After the presentation of each video sequence, the participants estimated the putting distance on a scale from 0 to 6 m and provided their confidence of prediction on a 5-point scale. Both experiments show comparable results for the respective dependent variables (error and confidence measures). The participants consistently overestimated the putting distance under the full vision conditions; however, the experiments did not show a pattern that was consistent with the FLE. Under the temporal occlusion condition, a prediction was not possible; rather a random estimation pattern was found around the centre of the prediction scale (3 m). Spatial occlusion did not affect errors and confidence of prediction. The experiments indicate that temporal constraints seem to be more critical than spatial constraints. The FLE may not apply to distance prediction compared to location estimation. |
| Sachgruppe der Dewey Dezimalklassifikatin (DDC): | 700 Künste und Unterhaltung > 796 Sport |
| Fachbereich(e)/-gebiet(e): | 03 Fachbereich Humanwissenschaften 03 Fachbereich Humanwissenschaften > Institut für Sportwissenschaft |
| Hinterlegungsdatum: | 02 Aug 2024 12:36 |
| Letzte Änderung: | 02 Aug 2024 12:36 |
| PPN: | |
| Export: | |
| Suche nach Titel in: | TUfind oder in Google |
Verfügbare Versionen dieses Eintrags
-
Perception and prediction of the putting distance of robot putting movements under different visual/viewing conditions. (deposited 30 Aug 2021 12:10)
- Perception and prediction of the putting distance of robot putting movements under different visual/viewing conditions. (deposited 02 Aug 2024 12:36) [Gegenwärtig angezeigt]
 |
Frage zum Eintrag |
Optionen (nur für Redakteure)
 |
Redaktionelle Details anzeigen |
Drucken
Impressum