TU Darmstadt / ULB / TUbiblio

Perspectives on Participation in Continuous Vocational Education Training–An Interview Study

Siegfried, Christin ; Berger, Josephine (2020)
Perspectives on Participation in Continuous Vocational Education Training–An Interview Study.
In: Frontiers in Psychology, 11
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01096
Artikel, Bibliographie

Dies ist die neueste Version dieses Eintrags.

Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract)

In European industrialized countries, a large number of companies in the healthcare, hotel, and catering sectors, as well as in the technology sector, are affected by demographic, political, and technological developments resulting in a greater need of skilled workers with a simultaneous shortage of skilled workers (CEDEFOP, 2015, 2016). Consequently, employers have to address workers who have not been taken into account such as low-skilled workers, workers returning from a career break, people with a migrant background, older people, and jobseekers and train them, in order to guarantee the professionalization of this workforce (Festing and Harsch, 2018). Continuing vocational education and training (CVET) is seen as an indispensable tool; because CVET has advantages for both employers and employees, it helps to increase the productivity of companies (Barrett and O’Connell, 2001), to prevent the widening of socioeconomic disparities (Dieckhoff, 2007), and to open up career opportunities for the workforce (Rubenson and Desjardins, 2009). However, participation rate on CVET seems to differ, depending on institutional factors (such as sector and size of the company) and individual characteristics (such as qualification level, migration background, age and time of absence from work) (e.g., Rubenson and Desjardins, 2009; Wiseman and Parry, 2017). In contrast to previous research, our study aims to provide a holistic view of reasons for and against CVET, combining the different perspectives of employers and (potential) employees. The analysis of reasons and barriers was carried out based on semi-structured interviews. Fifty-seven employers, 73 employees, and 42 jobseekers (potential employees) from the sectors retail, healthcare and social services, hotels and catering, and technology were interviewed. Results point to considerable differences in the reasons and barriers mentioned by the disadvantaged groups. These differences are particularly significant between employees on the one side and employers, as well as jobseekers, on the other side, while the reasons to attend CVET of jobseekers are more similar to those of employers. The results can be used to tailor CVET more closely to the needs of (potential) employees and thus strengthen both the qualification and career opportunities of (potential) employees and the competitiveness and productivity of companies.

Typ des Eintrags: Artikel
Erschienen: 2020
Autor(en): Siegfried, Christin ; Berger, Josephine
Art des Eintrags: Bibliographie
Titel: Perspectives on Participation in Continuous Vocational Education Training–An Interview Study
Sprache: Englisch
Publikationsjahr: 30 Juni 2020
Ort: Lausanne
Verlag: Frontiers Media S.A.
Titel der Zeitschrift, Zeitung oder Schriftenreihe: Frontiers in Psychology
Jahrgang/Volume einer Zeitschrift: 11
Kollation: 16 Seiten
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01096
Zugehörige Links:
Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract):

In European industrialized countries, a large number of companies in the healthcare, hotel, and catering sectors, as well as in the technology sector, are affected by demographic, political, and technological developments resulting in a greater need of skilled workers with a simultaneous shortage of skilled workers (CEDEFOP, 2015, 2016). Consequently, employers have to address workers who have not been taken into account such as low-skilled workers, workers returning from a career break, people with a migrant background, older people, and jobseekers and train them, in order to guarantee the professionalization of this workforce (Festing and Harsch, 2018). Continuing vocational education and training (CVET) is seen as an indispensable tool; because CVET has advantages for both employers and employees, it helps to increase the productivity of companies (Barrett and O’Connell, 2001), to prevent the widening of socioeconomic disparities (Dieckhoff, 2007), and to open up career opportunities for the workforce (Rubenson and Desjardins, 2009). However, participation rate on CVET seems to differ, depending on institutional factors (such as sector and size of the company) and individual characteristics (such as qualification level, migration background, age and time of absence from work) (e.g., Rubenson and Desjardins, 2009; Wiseman and Parry, 2017). In contrast to previous research, our study aims to provide a holistic view of reasons for and against CVET, combining the different perspectives of employers and (potential) employees. The analysis of reasons and barriers was carried out based on semi-structured interviews. Fifty-seven employers, 73 employees, and 42 jobseekers (potential employees) from the sectors retail, healthcare and social services, hotels and catering, and technology were interviewed. Results point to considerable differences in the reasons and barriers mentioned by the disadvantaged groups. These differences are particularly significant between employees on the one side and employers, as well as jobseekers, on the other side, while the reasons to attend CVET of jobseekers are more similar to those of employers. The results can be used to tailor CVET more closely to the needs of (potential) employees and thus strengthen both the qualification and career opportunities of (potential) employees and the competitiveness and productivity of companies.

Freie Schlagworte: continuous vocational education training, disadvantaged groups, reasons and barriers, interview study, employers, employees, jobseekers
ID-Nummer: Artikel-ID: 1096
Zusätzliche Informationen:

This article is part of the Research Topic: Continuous Vocational Education and Training in a Changing World - Requirements, Practices and Implementation Examples

Specialty section: This article was submitted to Organizational Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

Sachgruppe der Dewey Dezimalklassifikatin (DDC): 100 Philosophie und Psychologie > 150 Psychologie
300 Sozialwissenschaften > 370 Erziehung, Schul- und Bildungswesen
Fachbereich(e)/-gebiet(e): 03 Fachbereich Humanwissenschaften
03 Fachbereich Humanwissenschaften > Institut für Allgemeine Pädagogik und Berufspädagogik
Hinterlegungsdatum: 19 Mär 2024 10:19
Letzte Änderung: 19 Mär 2024 10:19
PPN:
Zugehörige Links:
Export:
Suche nach Titel in: TUfind oder in Google

Verfügbare Versionen dieses Eintrags

Frage zum Eintrag Frage zum Eintrag

Optionen (nur für Redakteure)
Redaktionelle Details anzeigen Redaktionelle Details anzeigen