Klamann, Björn ; Winner, Hermann (2021)
Comparing Different Levels of Technical Systems for a Modular Safety Approval : Why the State of the Art Does Not Dispense with System Tests Yet.
In: Energies, 14 (22)
doi: 10.3390/en14227516
Artikel, Bibliographie
Dies ist die neueste Version dieses Eintrags.
Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract)
While systems in the automotive industry have become increasingly complex, the related processes require comprehensive testing to be carried out at lower levels of a system. Nevertheless, the final safety validation is still required to be carried out at the system level by automotive standards like ISO 26262. Using its guidelines for the development of automated vehicles and applying them for field operation tests has been proven to be economically unfeasible. The concept of a modular safety approval provides the opportunity to reduce the testing effort after updates and for a broader set of vehicle variants. In this paper, we present insufficiencies that occur on lower levels of hierarchy compared to the system level. Using a completely new approach, we show that errors arise due to faulty decomposition processes wherein, e.g., functions, test scenarios, risks, or requirements of a system are decomposed to the module level. Thus, we identify three main categories of errors: insufficiently functional architectures, performing the wrong tests, and performing the right tests wrongly. We provide more detailed errors and present examples from the research project UNICARagil. Finally, these findings are taken to define rules for the development and testing of modules to dispense with system tests.
| Typ des Eintrags: | Artikel |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: | 2021 |
| Autor(en): | Klamann, Björn ; Winner, Hermann |
| Art des Eintrags: | Bibliographie |
| Titel: | Comparing Different Levels of Technical Systems for a Modular Safety Approval : Why the State of the Art Does Not Dispense with System Tests Yet |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Publikationsjahr: | 2021 |
| Titel der Zeitschrift, Zeitung oder Schriftenreihe: | Energies |
| Jahrgang/Volume einer Zeitschrift: | 14 |
| (Heft-)Nummer: | 22 |
| DOI: | 10.3390/en14227516 |
| URL / URN: | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/22/7516 |
| Zugehörige Links: | |
| Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract): | While systems in the automotive industry have become increasingly complex, the related processes require comprehensive testing to be carried out at lower levels of a system. Nevertheless, the final safety validation is still required to be carried out at the system level by automotive standards like ISO 26262. Using its guidelines for the development of automated vehicles and applying them for field operation tests has been proven to be economically unfeasible. The concept of a modular safety approval provides the opportunity to reduce the testing effort after updates and for a broader set of vehicle variants. In this paper, we present insufficiencies that occur on lower levels of hierarchy compared to the system level. Using a completely new approach, we show that errors arise due to faulty decomposition processes wherein, e.g., functions, test scenarios, risks, or requirements of a system are decomposed to the module level. Thus, we identify three main categories of errors: insufficiently functional architectures, performing the wrong tests, and performing the right tests wrongly. We provide more detailed errors and present examples from the research project UNICARagil. Finally, these findings are taken to define rules for the development and testing of modules to dispense with system tests. |
| Zusätzliche Informationen: | Artikel-ID: 7516 |
| Fachbereich(e)/-gebiet(e): | 16 Fachbereich Maschinenbau 16 Fachbereich Maschinenbau > Fachgebiet Fahrzeugtechnik (FZD) 16 Fachbereich Maschinenbau > Fachgebiet Fahrzeugtechnik (FZD) > Fahrerassistenzssysteme 16 Fachbereich Maschinenbau > Fachgebiet Fahrzeugtechnik (FZD) > Testverfahren |
| Hinterlegungsdatum: | 23 Nov 2021 06:23 |
| Letzte Änderung: | 03 Jul 2024 02:55 |
| PPN: | |
| Export: | |
| Suche nach Titel in: | TUfind oder in Google |
Verfügbare Versionen dieses Eintrags
-
Comparing Different Levels of Technical Systems for a Modular Safety Approval - Why the State of the Art Does Not Dispense with System Tests Yet. (deposited 22 Apr 2022 11:26)
- Comparing Different Levels of Technical Systems for a Modular Safety Approval : Why the State of the Art Does Not Dispense with System Tests Yet. (deposited 23 Nov 2021 06:23) [Gegenwärtig angezeigt]
 |
Frage zum Eintrag |
Optionen (nur für Redakteure)
 |
Redaktionelle Details anzeigen |
Drucken
Impressum