Harandi, Ali ; Tabib, Majd ; Alatassi, Baker ; Brepols, Tim ; Rezaei, Shahed ; Reese, Stefanie (2022)
A comparative study between phase‐field and micromorphic gradient‐extended damage models for brittle fracture.
In: PAMM - Proceedings in Applied Mathematics & Mechanics, 22 (1)
doi: 10.1002/pamm.202200192
Artikel, Bibliographie
Dies ist die neueste Version dieses Eintrags.
Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract)
To circumvent a mesh dependency of damage models, non‐local approaches such as phase‐field and gradient‐extended damage models have shown a good capability and attracted a lot of attention for modeling fracture. These models can predict crack nucleation, kinking, and branching. The gradient‐extended formulation proposed by [1, 2], which includes a micromorphic degree of freedom for damage, is connected to a phase‐field damage model presented in [3]; by connecting fracture parameters in brittle fracture. The latter is followed by comparing the thermodynamic consistency of these models. Despite having similarities in the formulation, gradient‐extended models differ from the standard phase‐field ones by having a damage threshold. Besides that, the local iteration exists in the gradient‐extended damage models. By employing the cohesive phase‐field model or the Angiotensin type 1 (AT1), a damage threshold appears in the formulation; by having a linear term for damage in the crack density function, see [4,5,12]. A comparison between these models is made, by taking several numerical examples and comparing their responses in a quasi‐static case. Moreover, the feasibility of different responses is addressed when one uses a standard Newton‐Raphson solver or the arc‐length one for solving a boundary value problem.
| Typ des Eintrags: | Artikel |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: | 2022 |
| Autor(en): | Harandi, Ali ; Tabib, Majd ; Alatassi, Baker ; Brepols, Tim ; Rezaei, Shahed ; Reese, Stefanie |
| Art des Eintrags: | Bibliographie |
| Titel: | A comparative study between phase‐field and micromorphic gradient‐extended damage models for brittle fracture |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Publikationsjahr: | 2022 |
| Ort: | Darmstadt |
| Verlag: | Wiley-VCH |
| Titel der Zeitschrift, Zeitung oder Schriftenreihe: | PAMM - Proceedings in Applied Mathematics & Mechanics |
| Jahrgang/Volume einer Zeitschrift: | 22 |
| (Heft-)Nummer: | 1 |
| Kollation: | 6 Seiten |
| DOI: | 10.1002/pamm.202200192 |
| Zugehörige Links: | |
| Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract): | To circumvent a mesh dependency of damage models, non‐local approaches such as phase‐field and gradient‐extended damage models have shown a good capability and attracted a lot of attention for modeling fracture. These models can predict crack nucleation, kinking, and branching. The gradient‐extended formulation proposed by [1, 2], which includes a micromorphic degree of freedom for damage, is connected to a phase‐field damage model presented in [3]; by connecting fracture parameters in brittle fracture. The latter is followed by comparing the thermodynamic consistency of these models. Despite having similarities in the formulation, gradient‐extended models differ from the standard phase‐field ones by having a damage threshold. Besides that, the local iteration exists in the gradient‐extended damage models. By employing the cohesive phase‐field model or the Angiotensin type 1 (AT1), a damage threshold appears in the formulation; by having a linear term for damage in the crack density function, see [4,5,12]. A comparison between these models is made, by taking several numerical examples and comparing their responses in a quasi‐static case. Moreover, the feasibility of different responses is addressed when one uses a standard Newton‐Raphson solver or the arc‐length one for solving a boundary value problem. |
| Zusätzliche Informationen: | Special Issue: 92nd Annual Meeting of the International Association of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics (GAMM) |
| Sachgruppe der Dewey Dezimalklassifikatin (DDC): | 600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 620 Ingenieurwissenschaften und Maschinenbau |
| Fachbereich(e)/-gebiet(e): | 11 Fachbereich Material- und Geowissenschaften 11 Fachbereich Material- und Geowissenschaften > Materialwissenschaft 11 Fachbereich Material- und Geowissenschaften > Materialwissenschaft > Fachgebiet Mechanik Funktionaler Materialien |
| Hinterlegungsdatum: | 02 Aug 2024 12:52 |
| Letzte Änderung: | 02 Aug 2024 12:52 |
| PPN: | |
| Export: | |
| Suche nach Titel in: | TUfind oder in Google |
Verfügbare Versionen dieses Eintrags
-
A comparative study between phase‐field and micromorphic gradient‐extended damage models for brittle fracture. (deposited 12 Mai 2023 08:40)
- A comparative study between phase‐field and micromorphic gradient‐extended damage models for brittle fracture. (deposited 02 Aug 2024 12:52) [Gegenwärtig angezeigt]
 |
Frage zum Eintrag |
Optionen (nur für Redakteure)
 |
Redaktionelle Details anzeigen |
Drucken
Impressum