TU Darmstadt / ULB / TUbiblio

Assessing the Involvement of Users During Development of Lower Limb Wearable Robotic Exoskeletons: A Survey Study

Ármannsdóttir, Anna L. ; Beckerle, Philipp ; Moreno, Juan C. ; Asseldonk, Edwin H. F. van ; Manrique-Sancho, Maria-Teresa ; del-Ama, Antonio J. ; Veneman, Jan F. ; Briem, Kristín (2024)
Assessing the Involvement of Users During Development of Lower Limb Wearable Robotic Exoskeletons: A Survey Study.
In: Human Factors: The Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2020, 62 (3)
doi: 10.26083/tuprints-00016627
Artikel, Zweitveröffentlichung, Verlagsversion

WarnungEs ist eine neuere Version dieses Eintrags verfügbar.

Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract)

Objective

To explore user-centered design methods currently implemented during development of lower limb wearable robots and how they are utilized during different stages of product development.

Background

Currently, there appears to be a lack of standardized frameworks for evaluation methods and design requirements to implement effective user-centered design for safe and effective clinical or ergonomic system application. Method

Responses from a total of 191 experts working in the field of lower limb exoskeletons were analyzed in this exploratory survey. Descriptive statistics were used to present responses and measures of frequency, and chi-square tests were used to contrast the answers of respondents who identified as clinicians versus engineers.

Results

A vast majority of respondents involve users in their development, in particular at the initial and iterative stages, although some differences were found between disciplines. A variety of methods and metrics are used to capture feedback from users and test devices, and although valuable, some methods used may not be based on validated measures. Guidelines regarding tests on safety of exoskeletons also lack standardization.

Conclusion

There seems to be a consensus among experts regarding the importance of a user-centered approach in exoskeleton development; however, standardized frameworks with regard to appropriate testing methods and design approaches are lacking. Such frameworks should consider an interdisciplinary focus on the needs and safety of the intended user during each iteration of the process.

Application

This exploratory study provides an overview of current practice among engineers and clinicians regarding the user-centered design of exoskeletons. Limitations and recommendations for future directions are identified.

Typ des Eintrags: Artikel
Erschienen: 2024
Autor(en): Ármannsdóttir, Anna L. ; Beckerle, Philipp ; Moreno, Juan C. ; Asseldonk, Edwin H. F. van ; Manrique-Sancho, Maria-Teresa ; del-Ama, Antonio J. ; Veneman, Jan F. ; Briem, Kristín
Art des Eintrags: Zweitveröffentlichung
Titel: Assessing the Involvement of Users During Development of Lower Limb Wearable Robotic Exoskeletons: A Survey Study
Sprache: Englisch
Publikationsjahr: 21 Mai 2024
Ort: Darmstadt
Publikationsdatum der Erstveröffentlichung: 2020
Ort der Erstveröffentlichung: Thousand Oaks, California, USA
Verlag: SAGE Publications
Titel der Zeitschrift, Zeitung oder Schriftenreihe: Human Factors: The Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Jahrgang/Volume einer Zeitschrift: 62
(Heft-)Nummer: 3
DOI: 10.26083/tuprints-00016627
URL / URN: https://tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/16627
Zugehörige Links:
Herkunft: Zweitveröffentlichung DeepGreen
Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract):

Objective

To explore user-centered design methods currently implemented during development of lower limb wearable robots and how they are utilized during different stages of product development.

Background

Currently, there appears to be a lack of standardized frameworks for evaluation methods and design requirements to implement effective user-centered design for safe and effective clinical or ergonomic system application. Method

Responses from a total of 191 experts working in the field of lower limb exoskeletons were analyzed in this exploratory survey. Descriptive statistics were used to present responses and measures of frequency, and chi-square tests were used to contrast the answers of respondents who identified as clinicians versus engineers.

Results

A vast majority of respondents involve users in their development, in particular at the initial and iterative stages, although some differences were found between disciplines. A variety of methods and metrics are used to capture feedback from users and test devices, and although valuable, some methods used may not be based on validated measures. Guidelines regarding tests on safety of exoskeletons also lack standardization.

Conclusion

There seems to be a consensus among experts regarding the importance of a user-centered approach in exoskeleton development; however, standardized frameworks with regard to appropriate testing methods and design approaches are lacking. Such frameworks should consider an interdisciplinary focus on the needs and safety of the intended user during each iteration of the process.

Application

This exploratory study provides an overview of current practice among engineers and clinicians regarding the user-centered design of exoskeletons. Limitations and recommendations for future directions are identified.

Freie Schlagworte: wearable robots, user-centered design strategies, outcome measures, usability testing and evaluation
Status: Verlagsversion
URN: urn:nbn:de:tuda-tuprints-166278
Sachgruppe der Dewey Dezimalklassifikatin (DDC): 600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 600 Technik
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 610 Medizin, Gesundheit
Fachbereich(e)/-gebiet(e): 16 Fachbereich Maschinenbau
16 Fachbereich Maschinenbau > Institut für Mechatronische Systeme im Maschinenbau (IMS)
16 Fachbereich Maschinenbau > Institut für Mechatronische Systeme im Maschinenbau (IMS) > Mensch-Mechatronik Synergie
Zentrale Einrichtungen
Zentrale Einrichtungen > Centre for Cognitive Science (CCS)
Hinterlegungsdatum: 21 Mai 2024 09:14
Letzte Änderung: 22 Mai 2024 06:27
PPN:
Export:
Suche nach Titel in: TUfind oder in Google

Verfügbare Versionen dieses Eintrags

Frage zum Eintrag Frage zum Eintrag

Optionen (nur für Redakteure)
Redaktionelle Details anzeigen Redaktionelle Details anzeigen