TU Darmstadt / ULB / TUbiblio

Fanfiction R-rated – A Quantitative Study of Sensitive Topics in German Fanfiction

Häußler, Julian
Hrsg.: Bartsch, Sabine ; Gius, Evelyn ; Müller, Marcus ; Rapp, Andrea ; Weitin, Thomas (2023)
Fanfiction R-rated – A Quantitative Study of Sensitive Topics in German Fanfiction.
doi: 10.26083/tuprints-00024720
Buch, Erstveröffentlichung, Verlagsversion

Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract)

The internet has brought on a variety of new forms of literary expression: from self-published novels, over complex hyperfiction forms or automatically generated texts, to large forums of variegated fanfiction. A removal of authorities (”Wegfall der Kontrollinstanzen” (Simanowski 2005)) allows writers to release texts which due to their style or content most probably would not work in a traditional book setting. This can reach from curiosities like the mid-2020 release of the Kindle eBook Kissing the Coronavirus, which became an internet sensation and has been deemed as a ”masterpiece of bad erotica” by a Reddit user (see ParadoxicallyItWas 2020), to the complex system of fanfiction writing. Systemic approaches to digital literature, especially in German studies, are rare (see Ries 2021), though studying the commonalities of literature on the internet may give valuable insights on readers and writers interests. ”Fanfiction R-rated - A Quantitative Study of Sensitive Topics in German Fanfiction”, deals with fanfiction by setting it into the context of literary writing on the internet and describing the effects of the previously mentioned low boundaries for publication.

Fanfictions are literary texts of appropriative-derivative or transformative nature that are produced in a fandom by fans and are based on e.g. novels, films or TV-Series (see Stemberger 2021, p. 10). Due to their fannish nature, fanfiction writers operate from a standpoint of adoration of and frustration with a specific source material (see Jenkins 1992). This results in a variety of stories that try to expand the source material and/or seek to rework it to reflect authors’ needs. Apparently, artistic freedom is used to full capacity, particularly, as Catherine Tosenberger describes it, ”with regard to non-normative and taboo forms and representations of sexuality” (Tosenberger 2014, p. 17). The research objective of this thesis is thus to study the effects of the especially low boundaries for publication in fanfiction and what role more sensitive topics play in contemporary fanfiction. The study at hand will look at how to examine these phenomena on a corpus of German fanfiction written between the beginning of 2020 and the end of 2021, which has been collected by the LitLab of the TU Darmstadt. To manage the size of this corpus, examine trends, and integrate the rich metadata the data set offers, quantitative approaches are most suitable. The project therefore will include metadata analysis as well as quantitative textual analyses.

Theoretical background will be laid out in chapters 2 and 3, setting this study in the context of wider studies of literature on the internet and describing the mechanisms underlying the process of fanfiction writing. Following this, the two key hypotheses will be explained in chapter 4. Thereby the first hypothesis says that in the fanfiction corpus at hand trends reflect the use of sensitive topics and the second hypothesis says that word meaning is altered in a way that blurs the difference between sensitive and non-sensitive topics. As a first analytical method, the metadata will be evaluated statistically in order to create a useful cut of the corpus and to describe how age restriction and genre tags hint at the discussion of sensitive topics (see chapter 6). Then, chapter 7 will describe how word embedding models can be created and used to examine the use of certain keywords in a corpus. An exemplary analysis will show how certain keywords express sensitive and non-sensitive topics and how the difference between these areas can become blurry. The results will be evaluated (chapter 8) and concluded with an outlook (chapter 9).

Typ des Eintrags: Buch
Erschienen: 2023
Herausgeber: Bartsch, Sabine ; Gius, Evelyn ; Müller, Marcus ; Rapp, Andrea ; Weitin, Thomas
Autor(en): Häußler, Julian
Art des Eintrags: Erstveröffentlichung
Titel: Fanfiction R-rated – A Quantitative Study of Sensitive Topics in German Fanfiction
Sprache: Englisch
Publikationsjahr: 17 Oktober 2023
Ort: Darmstadt
Reihe: Digital Philology | Evolving Scholarship in Digital Philology
Band einer Reihe: 7
Kollation: 52 Seiten
DOI: 10.26083/tuprints-00024720
URL / URN: https://tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/24720
Zugehörige Links:
Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract):

The internet has brought on a variety of new forms of literary expression: from self-published novels, over complex hyperfiction forms or automatically generated texts, to large forums of variegated fanfiction. A removal of authorities (”Wegfall der Kontrollinstanzen” (Simanowski 2005)) allows writers to release texts which due to their style or content most probably would not work in a traditional book setting. This can reach from curiosities like the mid-2020 release of the Kindle eBook Kissing the Coronavirus, which became an internet sensation and has been deemed as a ”masterpiece of bad erotica” by a Reddit user (see ParadoxicallyItWas 2020), to the complex system of fanfiction writing. Systemic approaches to digital literature, especially in German studies, are rare (see Ries 2021), though studying the commonalities of literature on the internet may give valuable insights on readers and writers interests. ”Fanfiction R-rated - A Quantitative Study of Sensitive Topics in German Fanfiction”, deals with fanfiction by setting it into the context of literary writing on the internet and describing the effects of the previously mentioned low boundaries for publication.

Fanfictions are literary texts of appropriative-derivative or transformative nature that are produced in a fandom by fans and are based on e.g. novels, films or TV-Series (see Stemberger 2021, p. 10). Due to their fannish nature, fanfiction writers operate from a standpoint of adoration of and frustration with a specific source material (see Jenkins 1992). This results in a variety of stories that try to expand the source material and/or seek to rework it to reflect authors’ needs. Apparently, artistic freedom is used to full capacity, particularly, as Catherine Tosenberger describes it, ”with regard to non-normative and taboo forms and representations of sexuality” (Tosenberger 2014, p. 17). The research objective of this thesis is thus to study the effects of the especially low boundaries for publication in fanfiction and what role more sensitive topics play in contemporary fanfiction. The study at hand will look at how to examine these phenomena on a corpus of German fanfiction written between the beginning of 2020 and the end of 2021, which has been collected by the LitLab of the TU Darmstadt. To manage the size of this corpus, examine trends, and integrate the rich metadata the data set offers, quantitative approaches are most suitable. The project therefore will include metadata analysis as well as quantitative textual analyses.

Theoretical background will be laid out in chapters 2 and 3, setting this study in the context of wider studies of literature on the internet and describing the mechanisms underlying the process of fanfiction writing. Following this, the two key hypotheses will be explained in chapter 4. Thereby the first hypothesis says that in the fanfiction corpus at hand trends reflect the use of sensitive topics and the second hypothesis says that word meaning is altered in a way that blurs the difference between sensitive and non-sensitive topics. As a first analytical method, the metadata will be evaluated statistically in order to create a useful cut of the corpus and to describe how age restriction and genre tags hint at the discussion of sensitive topics (see chapter 6). Then, chapter 7 will describe how word embedding models can be created and used to examine the use of certain keywords in a corpus. An exemplary analysis will show how certain keywords express sensitive and non-sensitive topics and how the difference between these areas can become blurry. The results will be evaluated (chapter 8) and concluded with an outlook (chapter 9).

Freie Schlagworte: digital philology, digital humanities, fanfiction, semantics, corpus studies, word embeddings, keyword analysis, sentiment analysis, digital literary studies, digitale Literaturwissenschaft
Status: Verlagsversion
URN: urn:nbn:de:tuda-tuprints-247203
Sachgruppe der Dewey Dezimalklassifikatin (DDC): 000 Allgemeines, Informatik, Informationswissenschaft > 000 Allgemeines, Wissenschaft
400 Sprache > 400 Sprache, Linguistik
400 Sprache > 420 Englisch
400 Sprache > 430 Deutsch
800 Literatur > 800 Literatur, Rhetorik, Literaturwissenschaft
800 Literatur > 820 Englische Literatur
800 Literatur > 830 Deutsche Literatur
Fachbereich(e)/-gebiet(e): 02 Fachbereich Gesellschafts- und Geschichtswissenschaften
02 Fachbereich Gesellschafts- und Geschichtswissenschaften > Institut für Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft
02 Fachbereich Gesellschafts- und Geschichtswissenschaften > Institut für Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft > Germanistik - Computerphilologie und Mediävistik
Hinterlegungsdatum: 17 Okt 2023 08:25
Letzte Änderung: 18 Okt 2023 05:16
PPN:
Export:
Suche nach Titel in: TUfind oder in Google
Frage zum Eintrag Frage zum Eintrag

Optionen (nur für Redakteure)
Redaktionelle Details anzeigen Redaktionelle Details anzeigen