TU Darmstadt / ULB / TUbiblio

Checking Timed Bisimulation with Bounded Zone-History Graphs - Technical Report

Luthmann, Lars ; Göttmann, Hendrik ; Lochau, Malte (2019)
Checking Timed Bisimulation with Bounded Zone-History Graphs - Technical Report.
doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1910.08992
Report, Bibliographie

Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract)

Timed automata (TA) are a well-established formalism for specifying discrete-state/continuous-time behavior of time-critical reactive systems. Concerning the fundamental analysis problem of comparing a candidate implementation against a specification, both given as TA, it has been shown that timed trace equivalence is undecidable, whereas timed bisimulation equivalence is decidable. The corresponding proof utilizes region graphs, a finite, but generally very space-consuming characterization of TA semantics. Hence, most practical TA tools utilize zone graphs instead, a symbolic and generally more efficient representation of TA semantics, to automate analysis tasks. However, zone graphs only produce sound results for analysis tasks being reducible to plain reachability problems thus being too imprecise for checking timed bisimilarity. In this paper, we propose bounded zone-history graphs, a novel characterization of TA semantics facilitating an adjustable trade-off between precision and scalability of timed-bisimilarity checking. Our tool TimBrCheck is, to the best of our knowledge, the only currently available tool for effectively checking timed bisimilarity and even supports non-deterministic TA with silent moves. We further present experimental results gained from applying our tool to a collection of community benchmarks, providing insights into trade-offs between precision and efficiency, depending on the bound value.

Typ des Eintrags: Report
Erschienen: 2019
Autor(en): Luthmann, Lars ; Göttmann, Hendrik ; Lochau, Malte
Art des Eintrags: Bibliographie
Titel: Checking Timed Bisimulation with Bounded Zone-History Graphs - Technical Report
Sprache: Englisch
Publikationsjahr: 20 Oktober 2019
Verlag: arXiv
Reihe: Formal Languages and Automata Theory
Kollation: 23 Seiten
DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1910.08992
URL / URN: https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.08992
Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract):

Timed automata (TA) are a well-established formalism for specifying discrete-state/continuous-time behavior of time-critical reactive systems. Concerning the fundamental analysis problem of comparing a candidate implementation against a specification, both given as TA, it has been shown that timed trace equivalence is undecidable, whereas timed bisimulation equivalence is decidable. The corresponding proof utilizes region graphs, a finite, but generally very space-consuming characterization of TA semantics. Hence, most practical TA tools utilize zone graphs instead, a symbolic and generally more efficient representation of TA semantics, to automate analysis tasks. However, zone graphs only produce sound results for analysis tasks being reducible to plain reachability problems thus being too imprecise for checking timed bisimilarity. In this paper, we propose bounded zone-history graphs, a novel characterization of TA semantics facilitating an adjustable trade-off between precision and scalability of timed-bisimilarity checking. Our tool TimBrCheck is, to the best of our knowledge, the only currently available tool for effectively checking timed bisimilarity and even supports non-deterministic TA with silent moves. We further present experimental results gained from applying our tool to a collection of community benchmarks, providing insights into trade-offs between precision and efficiency, depending on the bound value.

Zusätzliche Informationen:

1.Version

Fachbereich(e)/-gebiet(e): 18 Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik
18 Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik > Institut für Datentechnik > Echtzeitsysteme
18 Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik > Institut für Datentechnik
Hinterlegungsdatum: 28 Okt 2019 08:46
Letzte Änderung: 19 Dez 2024 08:59
PPN:
Export:
Suche nach Titel in: TUfind oder in Google
Frage zum Eintrag Frage zum Eintrag

Optionen (nur für Redakteure)
Redaktionelle Details anzeigen Redaktionelle Details anzeigen