Mayer, Peter ; Neumann, Stephan ; Storck, Daniel ; Volkamer, Melanie (2016)
Supporting Decision Makers in Choosing Suitable Authentication Schemes.
Frankfurt
Konferenzveröffentlichung, Bibliographie
Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract)
Despite its well-known deficiencies, the text password remains ubiquitous. Researchers previously suggested that this apparent conundrum was due to the complexity of choosing a suitable authentication scheme with respect to the desired application scenario. The plethora of alternatives can leave decision makers flummoxed and leads to their reaching for the familiar text password. To alleviate these difficulties, Renaud et al. suggested ACCESS (Authentication ChoiCE Support System), an abstract framework to support decision makers in this struggle. In this paper we present the first concrete realization of ACCESS. We create a knowledge base from the results of a literature review and present a technique which allows decision makers to specify their requirements effortlessly. The central contribution of this work is the realization of ACCESS’ feasibility analysis based on an adapted Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). This adaptation allows outsourcing the burden of knowing all authentication alternatives to experts, while keeping the complexity of the expert part as low as possible.
| Typ des Eintrags: | Konferenzveröffentlichung |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: | 2016 |
| Autor(en): | Mayer, Peter ; Neumann, Stephan ; Storck, Daniel ; Volkamer, Melanie |
| Art des Eintrags: | Bibliographie |
| Titel: | Supporting Decision Makers in Choosing Suitable Authentication Schemes |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Publikationsjahr: | Juli 2016 |
| Verlag: | University of Plymouth |
| Buchtitel: | International Symposium on Human Aspects of Information Security & Assurance (HAISA 2016) |
| Veranstaltungsort: | Frankfurt |
| Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract): | Despite its well-known deficiencies, the text password remains ubiquitous. Researchers previously suggested that this apparent conundrum was due to the complexity of choosing a suitable authentication scheme with respect to the desired application scenario. The plethora of alternatives can leave decision makers flummoxed and leads to their reaching for the familiar text password. To alleviate these difficulties, Renaud et al. suggested ACCESS (Authentication ChoiCE Support System), an abstract framework to support decision makers in this struggle. In this paper we present the first concrete realization of ACCESS. We create a knowledge base from the results of a literature review and present a technique which allows decision makers to specify their requirements effortlessly. The central contribution of this work is the realization of ACCESS’ feasibility analysis based on an adapted Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). This adaptation allows outsourcing the burden of knowing all authentication alternatives to experts, while keeping the complexity of the expert part as low as possible. |
| Freie Schlagworte: | Security, Usability and Society;Secure Data |
| ID-Nummer: | TUD-CS-2016-0119 |
| Fachbereich(e)/-gebiet(e): | LOEWE > LOEWE-Zentren > CASED – Center for Advanced Security Research Darmstadt 20 Fachbereich Informatik > SECUSO - Security, Usability and Society Profilbereiche > Cybersicherheit (CYSEC) LOEWE > LOEWE-Zentren 20 Fachbereich Informatik Profilbereiche LOEWE |
| Hinterlegungsdatum: | 28 Jul 2016 18:35 |
| Letzte Änderung: | 17 Mai 2018 13:02 |
| PPN: | |
| Export: | |
| Suche nach Titel in: | TUfind oder in Google |
 |
Frage zum Eintrag |
Optionen (nur für Redakteure)
 |
Redaktionelle Details anzeigen |
Drucken
Impressum