TU Darmstadt / ULB / TUbiblio

Implementation and Evaluation of the EasyVote Tallying Component and Ballot

Budurushi, Jurlind ; Renaud, Karen ; Volkamer, Melanie ; Woide, Marcel
eds.: Krimmer, Robert ; Volkamer, Melanie (2014)
Implementation and Evaluation of the EasyVote Tallying Component and Ballot.
Lochau
doi: 10.1109/EVOTE.2014.7001140
Conference or Workshop Item, Bibliographie

Abstract

The German federal constitutional court ruled, in 2009, that elections had to have a public nature. EasyVote, a promising hybrid electronic voting system for conducting elections with complex voting rules and huge ballots, meets this requirement. Two assumptions need to hold, however. The first is that voters will verify the human-readable part of the EasyVote ballot and detect discrepancies. Secondly, that electoral officials will act to verify that the human-readable part of the ballot is identical to the machine-readable part, and that they, too, will detect discrepancies. The first assumption was tested in prior work, so in this paper we examine the viability of the second assumption. 

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item
Erschienen: 2014
Editors: Krimmer, Robert ; Volkamer, Melanie
Creators: Budurushi, Jurlind ; Renaud, Karen ; Volkamer, Melanie ; Woide, Marcel
Type of entry: Bibliographie
Title: Implementation and Evaluation of the EasyVote Tallying Component and Ballot
Language: English
Date: October 2014
Publisher: IEEE
Book Title: 6th International Conference on Electronic Voting (EVOTE)
Event Location: Lochau
DOI: 10.1109/EVOTE.2014.7001140
Corresponding Links:
Abstract:

The German federal constitutional court ruled, in 2009, that elections had to have a public nature. EasyVote, a promising hybrid electronic voting system for conducting elections with complex voting rules and huge ballots, meets this requirement. Two assumptions need to hold, however. The first is that voters will verify the human-readable part of the EasyVote ballot and detect discrepancies. Secondly, that electoral officials will act to verify that the human-readable part of the ballot is identical to the machine-readable part, and that they, too, will detect discrepancies. The first assumption was tested in prior work, so in this paper we examine the viability of the second assumption. 

Uncontrolled Keywords: Security, Usability and Society;Secure Data
Identification Number: TUD-CS-2014-0928
Divisions: 20 Department of Computer Science
20 Department of Computer Science > Theoretical Computer Science - Cryptography and Computer Algebra
20 Department of Computer Science > SECUSO - Security, Usability and Society
Profile Areas
Profile Areas > Cybersecurity (CYSEC)
LOEWE
LOEWE > LOEWE-Zentren
LOEWE > LOEWE-Zentren > CASED – Center for Advanced Security Research Darmstadt
Date Deposited: 28 Jul 2016 18:35
Last Modified: 12 Jan 2019 21:21
PPN:
Corresponding Links:
Export:
Suche nach Titel in: TUfind oder in Google
Send an inquiry Send an inquiry

Options (only for editors)
Show editorial Details Show editorial Details