TU Darmstadt / ULB / TUbiblio

How Good are Local Features for Classes of Geometric Objects

Stark, Michael ; Schiele, Bernt (2007)
How Good are Local Features for Classes of Geometric Objects.
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Konferenzveröffentlichung, Bibliographie

Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract)

Recent work in object categorization often uses local image descriptors such as SIFT to learn and detect object categories. As such descriptors explicitly code local appearance they have shown impressive results on objects with sufficient local appearance statistics. However, many important object classes such as tools, cups and other man-made artifacts seem to require features that capture the respective shape and geometric layout of those object classes. Therefore this paper compares, on a novel data collection of 10 geometric object classes, various shape-based features with more appearance based descriptors such as SIFT. The analysis includes a direct comparison of feature statistics as well as the results within standard recognition frameworks. The results suggest that there are indeed differences between shape- based and more appearance-based features but that those differences do not always conform with what one might expect.

Typ des Eintrags: Konferenzveröffentlichung
Erschienen: 2007
Autor(en): Stark, Michael ; Schiele, Bernt
Art des Eintrags: Bibliographie
Titel: How Good are Local Features for Classes of Geometric Objects
Sprache: Deutsch
Publikationsjahr: 2007
Buchtitel: 11th IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV 2007)
Veranstaltungsort: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract):

Recent work in object categorization often uses local image descriptors such as SIFT to learn and detect object categories. As such descriptors explicitly code local appearance they have shown impressive results on objects with sufficient local appearance statistics. However, many important object classes such as tools, cups and other man-made artifacts seem to require features that capture the respective shape and geometric layout of those object classes. Therefore this paper compares, on a novel data collection of 10 geometric object classes, various shape-based features with more appearance based descriptors such as SIFT. The analysis includes a direct comparison of feature statistics as well as the results within standard recognition frameworks. The results suggest that there are indeed differences between shape- based and more appearance-based features but that those differences do not always conform with what one might expect.

Fachbereich(e)/-gebiet(e): 20 Fachbereich Informatik
Hinterlegungsdatum: 31 Dez 2016 10:04
Letzte Änderung: 16 Mai 2018 12:47
PPN:
Export:
Suche nach Titel in: TUfind oder in Google
Frage zum Eintrag Frage zum Eintrag

Optionen (nur für Redakteure)
Redaktionelle Details anzeigen Redaktionelle Details anzeigen