Marky, Karola ; Kulyk, Oksana ; Renaud, Karen ; Volkamer, Melanie (2018)
What Did I Really Vote For? - On the Usability of Verifiable E-Voting Schemes.
Montreal, QC, Canada
doi: 10.1145/3173574.3173750
Konferenzveröffentlichung, Bibliographie
Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract)
E-voting has been embraced by a number of countries, delivering benefits in terms of efficiency and accessibility. End-to-end verifiable e-voting schemes facilitate verification of the integrity of individual votes during the election process. In particular, methods for cast-as-intended verification enable voters to confirm that their cast votes have not been manipulated by the voting client. A well-known technique for effecting cast-as-intended verification is the Benaloh Challenge. The usability of this challenge is crucial because voters have to be actively engaged in the verification process. In this paper, we report on a usability evaluation of three different approaches of the Benaloh Challenge in the remote e-voting context. We performed a comparative user study with 95 participants. We conclude with a recommendation for which approaches should be provided to afford verification in real-world elections and suggest usability improvements.
| Typ des Eintrags: | Konferenzveröffentlichung |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: | 2018 |
| Autor(en): | Marky, Karola ; Kulyk, Oksana ; Renaud, Karen ; Volkamer, Melanie |
| Art des Eintrags: | Bibliographie |
| Titel: | What Did I Really Vote For? - On the Usability of Verifiable E-Voting Schemes |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Publikationsjahr: | April 2018 |
| Verlag: | ACM |
| Titel der Zeitschrift, Zeitung oder Schriftenreihe: | Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18) |
| Buchtitel: | Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI) |
| Veranstaltungsort: | Montreal, QC, Canada |
| DOI: | 10.1145/3173574.3173750 |
| URL / URN: | https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3173750 |
| Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract): | E-voting has been embraced by a number of countries, delivering benefits in terms of efficiency and accessibility. End-to-end verifiable e-voting schemes facilitate verification of the integrity of individual votes during the election process. In particular, methods for cast-as-intended verification enable voters to confirm that their cast votes have not been manipulated by the voting client. A well-known technique for effecting cast-as-intended verification is the Benaloh Challenge. The usability of this challenge is crucial because voters have to be actively engaged in the verification process. In this paper, we report on a usability evaluation of three different approaches of the Benaloh Challenge in the remote e-voting context. We performed a comparative user study with 95 participants. We conclude with a recommendation for which approaches should be provided to afford verification in real-world elections and suggest usability improvements. |
| Freie Schlagworte: | E-voting, End-to-end verifiability, Cast-as-intended Verifiability, Usability Evaluation, Benaloh Challenge |
| ID-Nummer: | TUD-CS-2018-0027 |
| Zusätzliche Informationen: | ISBN: 978-1-4503-5620-6 / ACMID: 3173750 |
| Fachbereich(e)/-gebiet(e): | 20 Fachbereich Informatik 20 Fachbereich Informatik > SECUSO - Security, Usability and Society |
| Hinterlegungsdatum: | 06 Feb 2018 15:21 |
| Letzte Änderung: | 08 Nov 2018 09:58 |
| PPN: | |
| Export: | |
| Suche nach Titel in: | TUfind oder in Google |
 |
Frage zum Eintrag |
Optionen (nur für Redakteure)
 |
Redaktionelle Details anzeigen |
Drucken
Impressum