Stab, Christian ; Gurevych, Iryna
Hrsg.: Tsujii, Junichi ; Hajic, Jan (2014)
Annotating Argument Components and Relations in Persuasive Essays.
Dublin, Ireland
Konferenzveröffentlichung, Bibliographie
Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract)
In this paper, we present a novel approach to model arguments, their components and relations in persuasive essays in English. We propose an annotation scheme that includes the annotation of claims and premises as well as support and attack relations for capturing the structure of argumentative discourse. We further conduct a manual annotation study with three annotators on 90 persuasive essays. The obtained inter-rater agreement of αU = 0.72 for argument components and α = 0.81 for argumentative relations indicates that the proposed annotation scheme successfully guides annotators to substantial agreement. The final corpus and the annotation guidelines are freely available to encourage future research in argument recognition.
Typ des Eintrags: | Konferenzveröffentlichung |
---|---|
Erschienen: | 2014 |
Herausgeber: | Tsujii, Junichi ; Hajic, Jan |
Autor(en): | Stab, Christian ; Gurevych, Iryna |
Art des Eintrags: | Bibliographie |
Titel: | Annotating Argument Components and Relations in Persuasive Essays |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Publikationsjahr: | August 2014 |
Verlag: | Dublin City University and Association for Computational Linguistics |
Buchtitel: | Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2014) |
Veranstaltungsort: | Dublin, Ireland |
URL / URN: | http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/C14-1142 |
Zugehörige Links: | |
Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract): | In this paper, we present a novel approach to model arguments, their components and relations in persuasive essays in English. We propose an annotation scheme that includes the annotation of claims and premises as well as support and attack relations for capturing the structure of argumentative discourse. We further conduct a manual annotation study with three annotators on 90 persuasive essays. The obtained inter-rater agreement of αU = 0.72 for argument components and α = 0.81 for argumentative relations indicates that the proposed annotation scheme successfully guides annotators to substantial agreement. The final corpus and the annotation guidelines are freely available to encourage future research in argument recognition. |
Freie Schlagworte: | UKP_reviewed;UKP_a_ENLP;UKP_a_ArMin |
ID-Nummer: | TUD-CS-2014-0823 |
Fachbereich(e)/-gebiet(e): | 20 Fachbereich Informatik 20 Fachbereich Informatik > Ubiquitäre Wissensverarbeitung |
Hinterlegungsdatum: | 31 Dez 2016 14:29 |
Letzte Änderung: | 24 Jan 2020 12:03 |
PPN: | |
Export: | |
Suche nach Titel in: | TUfind oder in Google |
Frage zum Eintrag |
Optionen (nur für Redakteure)
Redaktionelle Details anzeigen |