TU Darmstadt / ULB / TUbiblio

Physician-Rating Platforms: How Does Your Doctor Feel?

Abramova, Olga ; Veltri, Natasha ; Krasnova, Hanna ; Kiatprasert, Sirima ; Buxmann, Peter (2016)
Physician-Rating Platforms: How Does Your Doctor Feel?
Americas Conference on Information Systems. San Diego, CA (11.08.2016-14.08.2016)
Konferenzveröffentlichung, Bibliographie

Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract)

Consumer review platforms have enjoyed success in retail, restaurant, hospitality and travel industries as a powerful quality tracking and information sharing tool. Consumer reviews of professional services are also popular, albeit different from reviews of an impersonal product or service. Public reviews of professional services inevitably link professional’s reputation to his or her identity as a private individual. This exploratory study focuses on healthcare professional services and physician-ranking platforms because the validity of these platforms and the applicability of the standard review system to medical industry has been frequently questioned. Analyzing survey responses from Swiss medical practitioners, this paper attempts to reconcile divergent interests of patients and physicians and to identify medical services evaluation criteria that should be incorporated into design of physician-rating platforms. While physicians accept evaluations of their friendliness, and office waiting time, general atmosphere, medical staff, location and cleanliness, they oppose consumer evaluation of their clinical competences.

Typ des Eintrags: Konferenzveröffentlichung
Erschienen: 2016
Autor(en): Abramova, Olga ; Veltri, Natasha ; Krasnova, Hanna ; Kiatprasert, Sirima ; Buxmann, Peter
Art des Eintrags: Bibliographie
Titel: Physician-Rating Platforms: How Does Your Doctor Feel?
Sprache: Englisch
Publikationsjahr: August 2016
Veranstaltungstitel: Americas Conference on Information Systems
Veranstaltungsort: San Diego, CA
Veranstaltungsdatum: 11.08.2016-14.08.2016
Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract):

Consumer review platforms have enjoyed success in retail, restaurant, hospitality and travel industries as a powerful quality tracking and information sharing tool. Consumer reviews of professional services are also popular, albeit different from reviews of an impersonal product or service. Public reviews of professional services inevitably link professional’s reputation to his or her identity as a private individual. This exploratory study focuses on healthcare professional services and physician-ranking platforms because the validity of these platforms and the applicability of the standard review system to medical industry has been frequently questioned. Analyzing survey responses from Swiss medical practitioners, this paper attempts to reconcile divergent interests of patients and physicians and to identify medical services evaluation criteria that should be incorporated into design of physician-rating platforms. While physicians accept evaluations of their friendliness, and office waiting time, general atmosphere, medical staff, location and cleanliness, they oppose consumer evaluation of their clinical competences.

Fachbereich(e)/-gebiet(e): 01 Fachbereich Rechts- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften
01 Fachbereich Rechts- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften > Betriebswirtschaftliche Fachgebiete
01 Fachbereich Rechts- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften > Betriebswirtschaftliche Fachgebiete > Wirtschaftsinformatik
01 Fachbereich Rechts- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften > Betriebswirtschaftliche Fachgebiete > Fachgebiet Software Business & Information Management
Hinterlegungsdatum: 10 Jan 2017 13:07
Letzte Änderung: 12 Feb 2018 11:21
PPN:
Export:
Suche nach Titel in: TUfind oder in Google
Frage zum Eintrag Frage zum Eintrag

Optionen (nur für Redakteure)
Redaktionelle Details anzeigen Redaktionelle Details anzeigen