Gerke, Rafael (2009)
Nominal rigidities and the dynamic effects of a monetary shock.
Report, Erstveröffentlichung
Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract)
Two dynamic sticky price models with monopolistic competition in the goods market are presented. In the first model, each intermediate goods producer faces quadratic costs of adjusting its nominal price as introduced by Rotemberg (1982); the second model incorporates staggered price setting as proposed by Taylor (1980) and recently discussed by Chari/Kehoe/McGrattan (2000). Using the approximation method and the toolkit of Uhlig (1999) these models are used to derive theoretical impulse response functions. One aim is to check whether these two different forms of nominal price rigidities imply quantitatively and qualitatively different impulse response functions. Interestingly, both models do not seem to imply as much persistence as empirical impulse response functions typically indicate. However, qualitative differences do exist.
Typ des Eintrags: | Report |
---|---|
Erschienen: | 2009 |
Autor(en): | Gerke, Rafael |
Art des Eintrags: | Erstveröffentlichung |
Titel: | Nominal rigidities and the dynamic effects of a monetary shock |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Publikationsjahr: | 2009 |
Ort: | Darmstadt |
Reihe: | Darmstadt Discussion Papers in Economics |
Band einer Reihe: | 107 |
URL / URN: | http://tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/4819 |
Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract): | Two dynamic sticky price models with monopolistic competition in the goods market are presented. In the first model, each intermediate goods producer faces quadratic costs of adjusting its nominal price as introduced by Rotemberg (1982); the second model incorporates staggered price setting as proposed by Taylor (1980) and recently discussed by Chari/Kehoe/McGrattan (2000). Using the approximation method and the toolkit of Uhlig (1999) these models are used to derive theoretical impulse response functions. One aim is to check whether these two different forms of nominal price rigidities imply quantitatively and qualitatively different impulse response functions. Interestingly, both models do not seem to imply as much persistence as empirical impulse response functions typically indicate. However, qualitative differences do exist. |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:tuda-tuprints-48199 |
Zusätzliche Informationen: | Erstellt August 2001 |
Sachgruppe der Dewey Dezimalklassifikatin (DDC): | 300 Sozialwissenschaften > 330 Wirtschaft |
Fachbereich(e)/-gebiet(e): | 01 Fachbereich Rechts- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften 01 Fachbereich Rechts- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften > Volkswirtschaftliche Fachgebiete |
Hinterlegungsdatum: | 07 Feb 2016 20:55 |
Letzte Änderung: | 25 Okt 2023 07:02 |
PPN: | |
Export: | |
Suche nach Titel in: | TUfind oder in Google |
Frage zum Eintrag |
Optionen (nur für Redakteure)
Redaktionelle Details anzeigen |