Rupp, Thomas (2009)
Meta Analysis of Empirical Deterrence Studies: an explorative contest.
Report, Erstveröffentlichung
Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract)
A sample of 200 studies empirically analyzing deterrence in some way is evaluated. Various methods of data mining (stepwise regressions, Extreme Bounds Analysis, Bayesian Model Averaging, manual and naive selections) are used to explore different influences of various variables on the results of each study. The preliminary results of these methods are tested against each other in a competition of methodology to evaluate their performance in forecasting and fitting the data and to conclude which methods should be favored in an upcoming extensive meta-analysis. It seems to be the case that restrictive methods (which select fewer variables) are to be preferred when predicting data ex ante, and less parsimonious methods (which select more variables) when data has to be fitted (ex post). In the former case forward stepwise regression or Bayesian Model Selection perform very well, whereas backward stepwise regression and Extreme Bounds Analysis are to be preferred in the latter case.
| Typ des Eintrags: | Report |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: | 2009 |
| Autor(en): | Rupp, Thomas |
| Art des Eintrags: | Erstveröffentlichung |
| Titel: | Meta Analysis of Empirical Deterrence Studies: an explorative contest |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Publikationsjahr: | 2009 |
| Ort: | Darmstadt |
| Reihe: | Darmstadt Discussion Papers in Economics |
| Band einer Reihe: | 174 |
| URL / URN: | http://tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/4753 |
| Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract): | A sample of 200 studies empirically analyzing deterrence in some way is evaluated. Various methods of data mining (stepwise regressions, Extreme Bounds Analysis, Bayesian Model Averaging, manual and naive selections) are used to explore different influences of various variables on the results of each study. The preliminary results of these methods are tested against each other in a competition of methodology to evaluate their performance in forecasting and fitting the data and to conclude which methods should be favored in an upcoming extensive meta-analysis. It seems to be the case that restrictive methods (which select fewer variables) are to be preferred when predicting data ex ante, and less parsimonious methods (which select more variables) when data has to be fitted (ex post). In the former case forward stepwise regression or Bayesian Model Selection perform very well, whereas backward stepwise regression and Extreme Bounds Analysis are to be preferred in the latter case. |
| Freie Schlagworte: | meta analysis, data mining, deterrence, criminometrics |
| URN: | urn:nbn:de:tuda-tuprints-47538 |
| Zusätzliche Informationen: | JEL classification: C81, K14, K42; Erstellt Juni 2006 |
| Sachgruppe der Dewey Dezimalklassifikatin (DDC): | 300 Sozialwissenschaften > 330 Wirtschaft |
| Fachbereich(e)/-gebiet(e): | 01 Fachbereich Rechts- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften 01 Fachbereich Rechts- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften > Volkswirtschaftliche Fachgebiete |
| Hinterlegungsdatum: | 31 Jan 2016 20:57 |
| Letzte Änderung: | 25 Okt 2023 09:31 |
| PPN: | |
| Export: | |
| Suche nach Titel in: | TUfind oder in Google |
 |
Frage zum Eintrag |
Optionen (nur für Redakteure)
 |
Redaktionelle Details anzeigen |
Drucken
Impressum