Metternich, Joachim ; Abele, Eberhard ; Bechtloff, Sven ; Seifermann, Stefan (2015)
Static Total Cost Comparison Model to Identify Economic Fields of Application of Cellular Manufacturing for Milling and Drilling Processes Versus Done-In-One-Concepts.
In: CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, Elsevier, Manchester, 64 (1)
Artikel, Bibliographie
Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract)
The predominant approach on machining is to manufacture a workpiece on a complex done-in-one machine tool. In contrast, the Cellular Manufacturing concept splits up the machining steps and distributes them sequentially to several simpler and cost-efficient machine tools with a higher manual workload. Both concepts are technically feasible, but the question which approach is favorable from an economic perspective is still open. This article first identifies relevant input factors like machining tasks, operator work content, labor and capital costs, etc. Available machine tools are grouped by a k-means cluster analysis, human tasks of operation are identified by an MTM-UAS analysis. Together with key performance indicators like ‘cell balancing efficiency’, all data are transferred into monetary values and combined to a static total cost comparison model. The paper closes with a validation on industrial parts and a sensitivity analysis of the results achieved.
| Typ des Eintrags: | Artikel |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: | 2015 |
| Autor(en): | Metternich, Joachim ; Abele, Eberhard ; Bechtloff, Sven ; Seifermann, Stefan |
| Art des Eintrags: | Bibliographie |
| Titel: | Static Total Cost Comparison Model to Identify Economic Fields of Application of Cellular Manufacturing for Milling and Drilling Processes Versus Done-In-One-Concepts |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Publikationsjahr: | 2015 |
| Titel der Zeitschrift, Zeitung oder Schriftenreihe: | CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, Elsevier, Manchester |
| Jahrgang/Volume einer Zeitschrift: | 64 |
| (Heft-)Nummer: | 1 |
| Reihe: | CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology |
| URL / URN: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2015.04.116 |
| Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract): | The predominant approach on machining is to manufacture a workpiece on a complex done-in-one machine tool. In contrast, the Cellular Manufacturing concept splits up the machining steps and distributes them sequentially to several simpler and cost-efficient machine tools with a higher manual workload. Both concepts are technically feasible, but the question which approach is favorable from an economic perspective is still open. This article first identifies relevant input factors like machining tasks, operator work content, labor and capital costs, etc. Available machine tools are grouped by a k-means cluster analysis, human tasks of operation are identified by an MTM-UAS analysis. Together with key performance indicators like ‘cell balancing efficiency’, all data are transferred into monetary values and combined to a static total cost comparison model. The paper closes with a validation on industrial parts and a sensitivity analysis of the results achieved. |
| Freie Schlagworte: | Manufacturing system, Economics, Model |
| Fachbereich(e)/-gebiet(e): | 16 Fachbereich Maschinenbau 16 Fachbereich Maschinenbau > Institut für Produktionsmanagement und Werkzeugmaschinen (PTW) |
| Hinterlegungsdatum: | 02 Jul 2015 14:18 |
| Letzte Änderung: | 19 Jun 2018 09:05 |
| PPN: | |
| Export: | |
| Suche nach Titel in: | TUfind oder in Google |
 |
Frage zum Eintrag |
Optionen (nur für Redakteure)
 |
Redaktionelle Details anzeigen |
Drucken
Impressum