TU Darmstadt / ULB / TUbiblio

Consequential life cycle assessment of demolition waste management in Germany

Dierks, Christian ; Hagedorn, Tabea ; Mack, Theresa ; Zeller, Vanessa (2024)
Consequential life cycle assessment of demolition waste management in Germany.
In: Frontiers in Sustainability, 2024, 5
doi: 10.26083/tuprints-00027830
Artikel, Zweitveröffentlichung, Verlagsversion

WarnungEs ist eine neuere Version dieses Eintrags verfügbar.

Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract)

Context: Bulk mineral waste materials such as construction and demolition waste are Germany’s largest waste stream. Despite the availability of high-quality recycling pathways such as road base layers, waste concrete is predominantly recycled into lower-quality recycling pathways like earthworks or unbound road construction. This is due to low demand for recycled aggregates in road base layers and frost protection layers, especially in public procurement.

Purpose: This study assesses the environmental consequences of increasing high-quality recycling of waste concrete in the near future to provide decision support for public procurement in Germany. The focus lies on climate change due to its importance for decision-makers. However, 17 other impact categories were assessed to avoid problem shifting.

Methods: Life cycle assessment (LCA) is applied with background data from ecoinvent 3.9.1. Impact assessment was conducted at midpoint level using IPCC 2021 and ReCiPe Midpoint (H). Foreground data were taken from literature and expert interviews. In line with the goal of this LCA, a consequential modeling approach was followed to account for changes in the material flow system. Substitution creates a cascade effect previously omitted in consequential LCA studies, in which lower quality recycling materials replace higher quality recycling materials in their respective utilization pathways.

Results and discussion: Increasing the high-quality recycling of waste concrete into road base layers causes a reduction in environmental impacts for all 18 impact categories, as it replaces natural aggregate and avoids backfilling of mixed mineral waste and excavated earth through substitution effects. Transport distances and ferrous metal recovery were identified as hot spots. Sensitivity analyses show that only transport is a significant issue.

Conclusion: Increasing the high-quality recycling of waste concrete in Germany is recommended in terms of environmental impacts. Lower-quality recycling is environmentally feasible only in cases where the avoided transport distances for natural aggregates and backfilling are significantly lower than the additional transport distances for high-quality recycling.

Typ des Eintrags: Artikel
Erschienen: 2024
Autor(en): Dierks, Christian ; Hagedorn, Tabea ; Mack, Theresa ; Zeller, Vanessa
Art des Eintrags: Zweitveröffentlichung
Titel: Consequential life cycle assessment of demolition waste management in Germany
Sprache: Englisch
Publikationsjahr: 16 September 2024
Ort: Darmstadt
Publikationsdatum der Erstveröffentlichung: 3 Juli 2024
Ort der Erstveröffentlichung: Lausanne
Verlag: Frontiers Media S.A.
Titel der Zeitschrift, Zeitung oder Schriftenreihe: Frontiers in Sustainability
Jahrgang/Volume einer Zeitschrift: 5
Kollation: 11 Seiten
DOI: 10.26083/tuprints-00027830
URL / URN: https://tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/27830
Zugehörige Links:
Herkunft: Zweitveröffentlichung DeepGreen
Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract):

Context: Bulk mineral waste materials such as construction and demolition waste are Germany’s largest waste stream. Despite the availability of high-quality recycling pathways such as road base layers, waste concrete is predominantly recycled into lower-quality recycling pathways like earthworks or unbound road construction. This is due to low demand for recycled aggregates in road base layers and frost protection layers, especially in public procurement.

Purpose: This study assesses the environmental consequences of increasing high-quality recycling of waste concrete in the near future to provide decision support for public procurement in Germany. The focus lies on climate change due to its importance for decision-makers. However, 17 other impact categories were assessed to avoid problem shifting.

Methods: Life cycle assessment (LCA) is applied with background data from ecoinvent 3.9.1. Impact assessment was conducted at midpoint level using IPCC 2021 and ReCiPe Midpoint (H). Foreground data were taken from literature and expert interviews. In line with the goal of this LCA, a consequential modeling approach was followed to account for changes in the material flow system. Substitution creates a cascade effect previously omitted in consequential LCA studies, in which lower quality recycling materials replace higher quality recycling materials in their respective utilization pathways.

Results and discussion: Increasing the high-quality recycling of waste concrete into road base layers causes a reduction in environmental impacts for all 18 impact categories, as it replaces natural aggregate and avoids backfilling of mixed mineral waste and excavated earth through substitution effects. Transport distances and ferrous metal recovery were identified as hot spots. Sensitivity analyses show that only transport is a significant issue.

Conclusion: Increasing the high-quality recycling of waste concrete in Germany is recommended in terms of environmental impacts. Lower-quality recycling is environmentally feasible only in cases where the avoided transport distances for natural aggregates and backfilling are significantly lower than the additional transport distances for high-quality recycling.

Freie Schlagworte: life cycle assessment, consequential LCA, mineral waste, construction and demolition waste, recycled aggregate
ID-Nummer: Artikel-ID: 1417637
Status: Verlagsversion
URN: urn:nbn:de:tuda-tuprints-278306
Zusätzliche Informationen:

Sec. Circular Economy

Sachgruppe der Dewey Dezimalklassifikatin (DDC): 300 Sozialwissenschaften > 333.7 Natürliche Ressourcen, Energie und Umwelt
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 624 Ingenieurbau und Umwelttechnik
Fachbereich(e)/-gebiet(e): 13 Fachbereich Bau- und Umweltingenieurwissenschaften
13 Fachbereich Bau- und Umweltingenieurwissenschaften > Institut IWAR - Wasser- und Abfalltechnik, Umwelt- und Raumplanung
13 Fachbereich Bau- und Umweltingenieurwissenschaften > Institut IWAR - Wasser- und Abfalltechnik, Umwelt- und Raumplanung > Fachgebiet Stoffstrommanagement und Ressourcenwirtschaft
Hinterlegungsdatum: 16 Sep 2024 11:32
Letzte Änderung: 17 Sep 2024 05:48
PPN:
Export:
Suche nach Titel in: TUfind oder in Google

Verfügbare Versionen dieses Eintrags

Frage zum Eintrag Frage zum Eintrag

Optionen (nur für Redakteure)
Redaktionelle Details anzeigen Redaktionelle Details anzeigen