TU Darmstadt / ULB / TUbiblio

Reviewer No. 2: Old and New Problems in Peer Review (Dagstuhl Seminar 24052)

Gurevych, Iryna ; Rogers, Anna ; Shah, Nihar B. ; Wang, Jingyan (2024)
Reviewer No. 2: Old and New Problems in Peer Review (Dagstuhl Seminar 24052).
In: Dagstuhl Reports, 14 (1)
doi: 10.4230/DagRep.14.1.130
Artikel, Bibliographie

Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract)

This report documents the program and the outcomes of Dagstuhl Seminar 24052 "Reviewer No. 2: Old and New Problems in Peer Review". This seminar provided a point of reflection on decades of personal experience of the participants in organizing different kinds of peer-reviewed venues in Natural Language Processing (NLP) and beyond, enabling an in-depth discussion of what has been tried, what seems to work and what doesn't. The outcomes of the seminar include a white paper co-authored by most of the seminar participants, which outlines the research program, methodological and empirical challenges for NLP for peer review. The discussions at the seminar also resulted in several concrete policy proposals and initiatives, some of which are already in motion at the Association for Computational Linguistics and elsewhere.

Typ des Eintrags: Artikel
Erschienen: 2024
Autor(en): Gurevych, Iryna ; Rogers, Anna ; Shah, Nihar B. ; Wang, Jingyan
Art des Eintrags: Bibliographie
Titel: Reviewer No. 2: Old and New Problems in Peer Review (Dagstuhl Seminar 24052)
Sprache: Englisch
Publikationsjahr: 30 Juli 2024
Verlag: Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik
Titel der Zeitschrift, Zeitung oder Schriftenreihe: Dagstuhl Reports
Jahrgang/Volume einer Zeitschrift: 14
(Heft-)Nummer: 1
DOI: 10.4230/DagRep.14.1.130
URL / URN: https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagRep.1...
Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract):

This report documents the program and the outcomes of Dagstuhl Seminar 24052 "Reviewer No. 2: Old and New Problems in Peer Review". This seminar provided a point of reflection on decades of personal experience of the participants in organizing different kinds of peer-reviewed venues in Natural Language Processing (NLP) and beyond, enabling an in-depth discussion of what has been tried, what seems to work and what doesn't. The outcomes of the seminar include a white paper co-authored by most of the seminar participants, which outlines the research program, methodological and empirical challenges for NLP for peer review. The discussions at the seminar also resulted in several concrete policy proposals and initiatives, some of which are already in motion at the Association for Computational Linguistics and elsewhere.

Fachbereich(e)/-gebiet(e): 20 Fachbereich Informatik
20 Fachbereich Informatik > Ubiquitäre Wissensverarbeitung
Hinterlegungsdatum: 27 Aug 2024 13:26
Letzte Änderung: 27 Aug 2024 13:26
PPN:
Export:
Suche nach Titel in: TUfind oder in Google
Frage zum Eintrag Frage zum Eintrag

Optionen (nur für Redakteure)
Redaktionelle Details anzeigen Redaktionelle Details anzeigen