Nordmann, Alfred
Hrsg.: Llored, Jean Pierre ; Nordmann, Alfred (2017)
Metachemistry.
In: The Philosophy of Chemistry: Practices, Methodologies, and Concepts, 2013
Buchkapitel, Zweitveröffentlichung, Postprint
 | Es ist eine neuere Version dieses Eintrags verfügbar. |
Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract)
The term "metachemistry" was introduced by Gaston Bachelard and served primarily to identify the need for a Whiteheadian ontology that could draw lessons from chemistry and that would hold for all of the sciences. This paper will follow Bachelard's proposal only to a very limited extent and take the notion of "metachemistry" in a different direction. Where Bachelard considered chemistry a pure science in its own right and generalized from a specific state of its development, “metachemistry” is in the following thought to provide general insights from an understanding of chemistry as an impure technoscience. The difference between metaphysics and metachemistry therefore signifies a shift in the kinds of questions one asks about the sciences and the technosciences and the kinds of answers one might expect. In respect to chemistry, this would amount to abandoning the question about the specific character of chemistry as opposed to physics. Instead of chemistry aspiring to hold its own in the pantheon of the sciences, the notion of metachemistry refers to chemistry as a technology for bringing forth new things. In respect to the implicit presuppositions of knowledge production, metaphysics refers to the conditions that allow for the scientific representation of facts while metachemistry to the conditions for the technoscientific realization of things. Arguably, Lavoisier's dictum that "there is nothing new in art and nature" is a precondition for scientific explanation and representation, but the alchemical tradition in all of chemistry and now, for example, in nanotechnology subverts this dictum permanently.
| Typ des Eintrags: | Buchkapitel |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: | 2017 |
| Herausgeber: | Llored, Jean Pierre |
| Autor(en): | Nordmann, Alfred |
| Art des Eintrags: | Zweitveröffentlichung |
| Titel: | Metachemistry |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Publikationsjahr: | 18 Oktober 2017 |
| Ort: | Darmstadt |
| Publikationsdatum der Erstveröffentlichung: | 2013 |
| Ort der Erstveröffentlichung: | Newcastle |
| Verlag: | Cambridge Scholars |
| Buchtitel: | The Philosophy of Chemistry: Practices, Methodologies, and Concepts |
| URL / URN: | https://tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/6880 |
| Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract): | The term "metachemistry" was introduced by Gaston Bachelard and served primarily to identify the need for a Whiteheadian ontology that could draw lessons from chemistry and that would hold for all of the sciences. This paper will follow Bachelard's proposal only to a very limited extent and take the notion of "metachemistry" in a different direction. Where Bachelard considered chemistry a pure science in its own right and generalized from a specific state of its development, “metachemistry” is in the following thought to provide general insights from an understanding of chemistry as an impure technoscience. The difference between metaphysics and metachemistry therefore signifies a shift in the kinds of questions one asks about the sciences and the technosciences and the kinds of answers one might expect. In respect to chemistry, this would amount to abandoning the question about the specific character of chemistry as opposed to physics. Instead of chemistry aspiring to hold its own in the pantheon of the sciences, the notion of metachemistry refers to chemistry as a technology for bringing forth new things. In respect to the implicit presuppositions of knowledge production, metaphysics refers to the conditions that allow for the scientific representation of facts while metachemistry to the conditions for the technoscientific realization of things. Arguably, Lavoisier's dictum that "there is nothing new in art and nature" is a precondition for scientific explanation and representation, but the alchemical tradition in all of chemistry and now, for example, in nanotechnology subverts this dictum permanently. |
| Status: | Postprint |
| URN: | urn:nbn:de:tuda-tuprints-68805 |
| Sachgruppe der Dewey Dezimalklassifikatin (DDC): | 000 Allgemeines, Informatik, Informationswissenschaft > 000 Allgemeines, Wissenschaft 100 Philosophie und Psychologie > 100 Philosophie 500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik > 500 Naturwissenschaften 500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik > 540 Chemie 600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 600 Technik |
| Fachbereich(e)/-gebiet(e): | 02 Fachbereich Gesellschafts- und Geschichtswissenschaften 02 Fachbereich Gesellschafts- und Geschichtswissenschaften > Institut für Philosophie 07 Fachbereich Chemie |
| Hinterlegungsdatum: | 20 Jun 2024 16:25 |
| Letzte Änderung: | 20 Jun 2024 16:25 |
| PPN: | 41971927X |
| Export: | |
| Suche nach Titel in: | TUfind oder in Google |
Verfügbare Versionen dieses Eintrags
- Metachemistry. (deposited 20 Jun 2024 16:25) [Gegenwärtig angezeigt]
 |
Frage zum Eintrag |
Optionen (nur für Redakteure)
 |
Redaktionelle Details anzeigen |
Drucken
Impressum