TU Darmstadt / ULB / TUbiblio

Disentangling how urbanisation influences moth diversity in grasslands

Sanetra, Dennis ; Berger, Johanna ; Hartlieb, Margarita ; Simons, Nadja K. ; Walther, Genevieve ; Blüthgen, Nico ; Staab, Michael (2024)
Disentangling how urbanisation influences moth diversity in grasslands.
In: Insect Conservation and Diversity, 2024, 17 (2)
doi: 10.26083/tuprints-00027120
Artikel, Zweitveröffentlichung, Verlagsversion

WarnungEs ist eine neuere Version dieses Eintrags verfügbar.

Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract)

1. Urban areas have profound impacts on local species diversity and composition through a set of intertwined changes in the environment. As the world is rapidly urbanising while simultaneously facing a biodiversity crisis, a better understanding of how urbanisation influences biodiversity is necessary.

2. To test if and how urbanisation influences moth diversity and whether urbanisation is acting directly or indirectly via urbanisation‐induced increased habitat isolation, smaller habitat area, higher light pollution and increased mowing intensity, we sampled moths with light trapping in 20 grasslands in the urban core of the city of Darmstadt (southwestern Germany) and 20 grasslands in the surrounding area.

3. Moth abundance and diversity decreased with increasing urbanisation. Smaller habitat area and high mowing intensity reduced moth abundance, while other environmental variables including isolation and light pollution had only indirect effects. High levels of urbanisation were associated with reduced moth abundance, which in turn drove declines in diversity. Urbanised sites favoured generalist species and differed in species composition compared to sites in the surrounding.

4. The results show that urbanisation is directly reducing moth abundance and diversity in cities. The negative effect of urbanisation is further attenuated by habitat fragmentation and high mowing intensity, which are both known drivers of biodiversity decline in urban areas and beyond.

5. While urbanisation itself is often irreversible, reducing mowing intensity and preserving larger grassland areas could facilitate moths and other taxa in and around cities.

Typ des Eintrags: Artikel
Erschienen: 2024
Autor(en): Sanetra, Dennis ; Berger, Johanna ; Hartlieb, Margarita ; Simons, Nadja K. ; Walther, Genevieve ; Blüthgen, Nico ; Staab, Michael
Art des Eintrags: Zweitveröffentlichung
Titel: Disentangling how urbanisation influences moth diversity in grasslands
Sprache: Englisch
Publikationsjahr: 11 Juni 2024
Ort: Darmstadt
Publikationsdatum der Erstveröffentlichung: März 2024
Ort der Erstveröffentlichung: Oxford
Verlag: Wiley-Blackwell
Titel der Zeitschrift, Zeitung oder Schriftenreihe: Insect Conservation and Diversity
Jahrgang/Volume einer Zeitschrift: 17
(Heft-)Nummer: 2
DOI: 10.26083/tuprints-00027120
URL / URN: https://tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/27120
Zugehörige Links:
Herkunft: Zweitveröffentlichung DeepGreen
Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract):

1. Urban areas have profound impacts on local species diversity and composition through a set of intertwined changes in the environment. As the world is rapidly urbanising while simultaneously facing a biodiversity crisis, a better understanding of how urbanisation influences biodiversity is necessary.

2. To test if and how urbanisation influences moth diversity and whether urbanisation is acting directly or indirectly via urbanisation‐induced increased habitat isolation, smaller habitat area, higher light pollution and increased mowing intensity, we sampled moths with light trapping in 20 grasslands in the urban core of the city of Darmstadt (southwestern Germany) and 20 grasslands in the surrounding area.

3. Moth abundance and diversity decreased with increasing urbanisation. Smaller habitat area and high mowing intensity reduced moth abundance, while other environmental variables including isolation and light pollution had only indirect effects. High levels of urbanisation were associated with reduced moth abundance, which in turn drove declines in diversity. Urbanised sites favoured generalist species and differed in species composition compared to sites in the surrounding.

4. The results show that urbanisation is directly reducing moth abundance and diversity in cities. The negative effect of urbanisation is further attenuated by habitat fragmentation and high mowing intensity, which are both known drivers of biodiversity decline in urban areas and beyond.

5. While urbanisation itself is often irreversible, reducing mowing intensity and preserving larger grassland areas could facilitate moths and other taxa in and around cities.

Freie Schlagworte: artificial light at night, Lepidoptera, light trapping, moths, mowing, species communities, species diversity, urban ecology
Status: Verlagsversion
URN: urn:nbn:de:tuda-tuprints-271201
Zusätzliche Informationen:

Special Issue: The Ecology and Conservation of Urban Insects

Sachgruppe der Dewey Dezimalklassifikatin (DDC): 500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik > 570 Biowissenschaften, Biologie
500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik > 590 Tiere (Zoologie)
Fachbereich(e)/-gebiet(e): 10 Fachbereich Biologie
10 Fachbereich Biologie > Ecological Networks
Hinterlegungsdatum: 11 Jun 2024 11:55
Letzte Änderung: 13 Jun 2024 09:21
PPN:
Export:
Suche nach Titel in: TUfind oder in Google

Verfügbare Versionen dieses Eintrags

Frage zum Eintrag Frage zum Eintrag

Optionen (nur für Redakteure)
Redaktionelle Details anzeigen Redaktionelle Details anzeigen