Tsakmakis, Charalampos ; Broese, Carsten ; Sideris, Stergios Alexandros (2024)
Dynamics in Explicit Gradient Elasticity: Material Frame-Indifference, Boundary Conditions and Consistent Euler–Bernoulli Beam Theory.
In: Materials, 17 (8)
doi: 10.3390/ma17081760
Artikel, Bibliographie
Dies ist die neueste Version dieses Eintrags.
Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract)
The paper is concerned with the boundary conditions of explicit gradient elasticity of Mindlin’s type in dynamics. It has been argued in an earlier paper that acceleration terms should not be present in the boundary tractions because of objectivity arguments. This is discussed in the present paper in more detail, and it is supplemented by assuming the validity of the principle of material frame indifference. Furthermore, new examples are discussed in order to illustrate that significant differences exist in the responses predicted by boundary tractions with and without acceleration terms.
| Typ des Eintrags: | Artikel |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: | 2024 |
| Autor(en): | Tsakmakis, Charalampos ; Broese, Carsten ; Sideris, Stergios Alexandros |
| Art des Eintrags: | Bibliographie |
| Titel: | Dynamics in Explicit Gradient Elasticity: Material Frame-Indifference, Boundary Conditions and Consistent Euler–Bernoulli Beam Theory |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Publikationsjahr: | 11 April 2024 |
| Ort: | Basel |
| Verlag: | MDPI |
| Titel der Zeitschrift, Zeitung oder Schriftenreihe: | Materials |
| Jahrgang/Volume einer Zeitschrift: | 17 |
| (Heft-)Nummer: | 8 |
| Kollation: | 33 Seiten |
| DOI: | 10.3390/ma17081760 |
| Zugehörige Links: | |
| Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract): | The paper is concerned with the boundary conditions of explicit gradient elasticity of Mindlin’s type in dynamics. It has been argued in an earlier paper that acceleration terms should not be present in the boundary tractions because of objectivity arguments. This is discussed in the present paper in more detail, and it is supplemented by assuming the validity of the principle of material frame indifference. Furthermore, new examples are discussed in order to illustrate that significant differences exist in the responses predicted by boundary tractions with and without acceleration terms. |
| Freie Schlagworte: | Mindlin’s gradient elasticity, extensions of Hamilton’s principle, boundary conditions, material frame-indifference, acceleration terms, consistent Euler–Bernoulli beam theory |
| ID-Nummer: | Artikel-ID: 1760 |
| Zusätzliche Informationen: | This article belongs to the Special Issue Computational Modelling and Design of Novel Engineering Materials (Second Edition) |
| Sachgruppe der Dewey Dezimalklassifikatin (DDC): | 600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 624 Ingenieurbau und Umwelttechnik |
| Fachbereich(e)/-gebiet(e): | 13 Fachbereich Bau- und Umweltingenieurwissenschaften 13 Fachbereich Bau- und Umweltingenieurwissenschaften > Fachgebiete der Mechanik 13 Fachbereich Bau- und Umweltingenieurwissenschaften > Fachgebiete der Mechanik > Fachgebiet Kontinuumsmechanik |
| Hinterlegungsdatum: | 14 Mai 2024 06:52 |
| Letzte Änderung: | 14 Mai 2024 06:52 |
| PPN: | |
| Export: | |
| Suche nach Titel in: | TUfind oder in Google |
Verfügbare Versionen dieses Eintrags
-
Dynamics in Explicit Gradient Elasticity: Material Frame-Indifference, Boundary Conditions and Consistent Euler–Bernoulli Beam Theory. (deposited 13 Mai 2024 12:58)
- Dynamics in Explicit Gradient Elasticity: Material Frame-Indifference, Boundary Conditions and Consistent Euler–Bernoulli Beam Theory. (deposited 14 Mai 2024 06:52) [Gegenwärtig angezeigt]
 |
Frage zum Eintrag |
Optionen (nur für Redakteure)
 |
Redaktionelle Details anzeigen |
Drucken
Impressum