TU Darmstadt / ULB / TUbiblio

Avoiding Pitfalls in Comparison of Activity and Selectivity of Solid Catalysts for Electrochemical HMF Oxidation

Wöllner, Sebastian ; Nowak, Timothy ; Zhang, Gui‐Rong ; Rockstroh, Nils ; Ghanem, Hanadi ; Rosiwal, Stefan ; Brückner, Angelika ; Etzold, Bastian J. M. (2024)
Avoiding Pitfalls in Comparison of Activity and Selectivity of Solid Catalysts for Electrochemical HMF Oxidation.
In: ChemistryOpen, 2021, 10 (5)
doi: 10.26083/tuprints-00020143
Artikel, Zweitveröffentlichung, Verlagsversion

WarnungEs ist eine neuere Version dieses Eintrags verfügbar.

Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract)

Electrocatalytic oxidation of 5‐hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) offers a renewable approach to produce the value‐added platform chemical 2,5‐furandicarboxylic acid (FDCA). The key for the economic viability of this approach is to develop active and selective electrocatalysts. Nevertheless, a reliable catalyst evaluation protocol is still missing, leading to elusive conclusions on criteria for a high‐performing catalyst. Herein, we demonstrate that besides the catalyst identity, secondary parameters such as materials of conductive substrates for the working electrode, concentration of the supporting electrolyte, and electrolyzer configurations have profound impact on the catalyst performance and thus need to be optimized before assessing the true activity of a catalyst. Moreover, we highlight the importance of those secondary parameters in suppressing side reactions, which has long been overlooked. The protocol is validated by evaluating the performance of free‐standing Cu‐foam, and CuCoO modified with NaPO₂H₂ and Ni, which were immobilized on boron‐doped diamond (BDD) electrodes. Recommended practices and figure of merits in carefully evaluating the catalyst performance are proposed.

Typ des Eintrags: Artikel
Erschienen: 2024
Autor(en): Wöllner, Sebastian ; Nowak, Timothy ; Zhang, Gui‐Rong ; Rockstroh, Nils ; Ghanem, Hanadi ; Rosiwal, Stefan ; Brückner, Angelika ; Etzold, Bastian J. M.
Art des Eintrags: Zweitveröffentlichung
Titel: Avoiding Pitfalls in Comparison of Activity and Selectivity of Solid Catalysts for Electrochemical HMF Oxidation
Sprache: Englisch
Publikationsjahr: 13 Februar 2024
Ort: Darmstadt
Publikationsdatum der Erstveröffentlichung: 2021
Ort der Erstveröffentlichung: Weinheim
Verlag: Wiley-VCH
Titel der Zeitschrift, Zeitung oder Schriftenreihe: ChemistryOpen
Jahrgang/Volume einer Zeitschrift: 10
(Heft-)Nummer: 5
DOI: 10.26083/tuprints-00020143
URL / URN: https://tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/20143
Zugehörige Links:
Herkunft: Zweitveröffentlichung DeepGreen
Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract):

Electrocatalytic oxidation of 5‐hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) offers a renewable approach to produce the value‐added platform chemical 2,5‐furandicarboxylic acid (FDCA). The key for the economic viability of this approach is to develop active and selective electrocatalysts. Nevertheless, a reliable catalyst evaluation protocol is still missing, leading to elusive conclusions on criteria for a high‐performing catalyst. Herein, we demonstrate that besides the catalyst identity, secondary parameters such as materials of conductive substrates for the working electrode, concentration of the supporting electrolyte, and electrolyzer configurations have profound impact on the catalyst performance and thus need to be optimized before assessing the true activity of a catalyst. Moreover, we highlight the importance of those secondary parameters in suppressing side reactions, which has long been overlooked. The protocol is validated by evaluating the performance of free‐standing Cu‐foam, and CuCoO modified with NaPO₂H₂ and Ni, which were immobilized on boron‐doped diamond (BDD) electrodes. Recommended practices and figure of merits in carefully evaluating the catalyst performance are proposed.

Alternatives oder übersetztes Abstract:
Alternatives AbstractSprache

Proposal of a measurement protocol for comparison of electrocatalysts for the HMF oxidation with standard evaluation (yield, faradaic efficiency), as well as a new figure of merit (production rate) to compare catalysts independent from setup size. Additionally, the alkaline degradation of HMF is evaluated and taken into account for closing the mass balance in order to assess the true catalyst activity.

Englisch
Freie Schlagworte: comparison of electrocatalysts, electrocatalysis, HMF oxidation, measurement protocol
Status: Verlagsversion
URN: urn:nbn:de:tuda-tuprints-201437
Zusätzliche Informationen:

This article also appears in: International Year of Basic Sciences for Sustainable Development

Sachgruppe der Dewey Dezimalklassifikatin (DDC): 600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 660 Technische Chemie
Fachbereich(e)/-gebiet(e): 07 Fachbereich Chemie
07 Fachbereich Chemie > Ernst-Berl-Institut
07 Fachbereich Chemie > Ernst-Berl-Institut > Fachgebiet Technische Chemie
07 Fachbereich Chemie > Ernst-Berl-Institut > Fachgebiet Technische Chemie > Technische Chemie I
Hinterlegungsdatum: 13 Feb 2024 10:40
Letzte Änderung: 14 Feb 2024 09:06
PPN:
Export:
Suche nach Titel in: TUfind oder in Google

Verfügbare Versionen dieses Eintrags

Frage zum Eintrag Frage zum Eintrag

Optionen (nur für Redakteure)
Redaktionelle Details anzeigen Redaktionelle Details anzeigen