Wöllner, Sebastian ; Nowak, Timothy ; Zhang, Gui‐Rong ; Rockstroh, Nils ; Ghanem, Hanadi ; Rosiwal, Stefan ; Brückner, Angelika ; Etzold, Bastian J. M. (2024)
Avoiding Pitfalls in Comparison of Activity and Selectivity of Solid Catalysts for Electrochemical HMF Oxidation.
In: ChemistryOpen, 2021, 10 (5)
doi: 10.26083/tuprints-00020143
Artikel, Zweitveröffentlichung, Verlagsversion
Es ist eine neuere Version dieses Eintrags verfügbar. |
Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract)
Electrocatalytic oxidation of 5‐hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) offers a renewable approach to produce the value‐added platform chemical 2,5‐furandicarboxylic acid (FDCA). The key for the economic viability of this approach is to develop active and selective electrocatalysts. Nevertheless, a reliable catalyst evaluation protocol is still missing, leading to elusive conclusions on criteria for a high‐performing catalyst. Herein, we demonstrate that besides the catalyst identity, secondary parameters such as materials of conductive substrates for the working electrode, concentration of the supporting electrolyte, and electrolyzer configurations have profound impact on the catalyst performance and thus need to be optimized before assessing the true activity of a catalyst. Moreover, we highlight the importance of those secondary parameters in suppressing side reactions, which has long been overlooked. The protocol is validated by evaluating the performance of free‐standing Cu‐foam, and CuCoO modified with NaPO₂H₂ and Ni, which were immobilized on boron‐doped diamond (BDD) electrodes. Recommended practices and figure of merits in carefully evaluating the catalyst performance are proposed.
Typ des Eintrags: | Artikel | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Erschienen: | 2024 | ||||
Autor(en): | Wöllner, Sebastian ; Nowak, Timothy ; Zhang, Gui‐Rong ; Rockstroh, Nils ; Ghanem, Hanadi ; Rosiwal, Stefan ; Brückner, Angelika ; Etzold, Bastian J. M. | ||||
Art des Eintrags: | Zweitveröffentlichung | ||||
Titel: | Avoiding Pitfalls in Comparison of Activity and Selectivity of Solid Catalysts for Electrochemical HMF Oxidation | ||||
Sprache: | Englisch | ||||
Publikationsjahr: | 13 Februar 2024 | ||||
Ort: | Darmstadt | ||||
Publikationsdatum der Erstveröffentlichung: | 2021 | ||||
Ort der Erstveröffentlichung: | Weinheim | ||||
Verlag: | Wiley-VCH | ||||
Titel der Zeitschrift, Zeitung oder Schriftenreihe: | ChemistryOpen | ||||
Jahrgang/Volume einer Zeitschrift: | 10 | ||||
(Heft-)Nummer: | 5 | ||||
DOI: | 10.26083/tuprints-00020143 | ||||
URL / URN: | https://tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/20143 | ||||
Zugehörige Links: | |||||
Herkunft: | Zweitveröffentlichung DeepGreen | ||||
Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract): | Electrocatalytic oxidation of 5‐hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) offers a renewable approach to produce the value‐added platform chemical 2,5‐furandicarboxylic acid (FDCA). The key for the economic viability of this approach is to develop active and selective electrocatalysts. Nevertheless, a reliable catalyst evaluation protocol is still missing, leading to elusive conclusions on criteria for a high‐performing catalyst. Herein, we demonstrate that besides the catalyst identity, secondary parameters such as materials of conductive substrates for the working electrode, concentration of the supporting electrolyte, and electrolyzer configurations have profound impact on the catalyst performance and thus need to be optimized before assessing the true activity of a catalyst. Moreover, we highlight the importance of those secondary parameters in suppressing side reactions, which has long been overlooked. The protocol is validated by evaluating the performance of free‐standing Cu‐foam, and CuCoO modified with NaPO₂H₂ and Ni, which were immobilized on boron‐doped diamond (BDD) electrodes. Recommended practices and figure of merits in carefully evaluating the catalyst performance are proposed. |
||||
Alternatives oder übersetztes Abstract: |
|
||||
Freie Schlagworte: | comparison of electrocatalysts, electrocatalysis, HMF oxidation, measurement protocol | ||||
Status: | Verlagsversion | ||||
URN: | urn:nbn:de:tuda-tuprints-201437 | ||||
Zusätzliche Informationen: | This article also appears in: International Year of Basic Sciences for Sustainable Development |
||||
Sachgruppe der Dewey Dezimalklassifikatin (DDC): | 600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 660 Technische Chemie | ||||
Fachbereich(e)/-gebiet(e): | 07 Fachbereich Chemie 07 Fachbereich Chemie > Ernst-Berl-Institut 07 Fachbereich Chemie > Ernst-Berl-Institut > Fachgebiet Technische Chemie 07 Fachbereich Chemie > Ernst-Berl-Institut > Fachgebiet Technische Chemie > Technische Chemie I |
||||
Hinterlegungsdatum: | 13 Feb 2024 10:40 | ||||
Letzte Änderung: | 14 Feb 2024 09:06 | ||||
PPN: | |||||
Export: | |||||
Suche nach Titel in: | TUfind oder in Google |
Verfügbare Versionen dieses Eintrags
- Avoiding Pitfalls in Comparison of Activity and Selectivity of Solid Catalysts for Electrochemical HMF Oxidation. (deposited 13 Feb 2024 10:40) [Gegenwärtig angezeigt]
Frage zum Eintrag |
Optionen (nur für Redakteure)
Redaktionelle Details anzeigen |