TU Darmstadt / ULB / TUbiblio

The Impact of Audit Quality Indicators on the Timeliness of Goodwill Impairments: Evidence from the German Setting

Albersmann, Benjamin T. ; Quick, Reiner (2023)
The Impact of Audit Quality Indicators on the Timeliness of Goodwill Impairments: Evidence from the German Setting.
In: Abacus : a journal of accounting, finance and business studies, 2020, 56 (1)
doi: 10.26083/tuprints-00017793
Artikel, Zweitveröffentlichung, Verlagsversion

WarnungEs ist eine neuere Version dieses Eintrags verfügbar.

Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract)

This study investigates whether goodwill impairments are perceived as timely and whether specific auditor characteristics affect the perceived timeliness. It therefore contributes to central questions in accounting research: is managerial discretion over accounting numbers (accounting choice) good or bad for stakeholders and does audit quality have an impact on this relationship? It is motivated by the IASB's post‐implementation review on business combinations and the Goodwill and Impairment project based on it, the ongoing debate on the decision usefulness of impairment testing, and the question whether auditors have an impact on firms’ reporting of impairment losses. Based on a sample of German listed firms for the period 2006 to 2013, the results indicate that goodwill impairments are not recognized in a timely manner and delayed by at least one to two years. Moreover, the findings suggest that the recognition of impairment losses is influenced by auditor characteristics. In particular, firms seem to report goodwill impairments in a more timely fashion when they are audited by a Big 4 auditor, whereas the timeliness seems to decrease with a higher non‐audit fee ratio and a longer auditor tenure. Moreover, additional analyses indicate that higher audit fees lead to more timely impairments.

Typ des Eintrags: Artikel
Erschienen: 2023
Autor(en): Albersmann, Benjamin T. ; Quick, Reiner
Art des Eintrags: Zweitveröffentlichung
Titel: The Impact of Audit Quality Indicators on the Timeliness of Goodwill Impairments: Evidence from the German Setting
Sprache: Englisch
Publikationsjahr: 14 November 2023
Ort: Darmstadt
Publikationsdatum der Erstveröffentlichung: 2020
Ort der Erstveröffentlichung: Oxford
Verlag: John Wiley & Sons
Titel der Zeitschrift, Zeitung oder Schriftenreihe: Abacus : a journal of accounting, finance and business studies
Jahrgang/Volume einer Zeitschrift: 56
(Heft-)Nummer: 1
DOI: 10.26083/tuprints-00017793
URL / URN: https://tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/17793
Zugehörige Links:
Herkunft: Zweitveröffentlichung DeepGreen
Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract):

This study investigates whether goodwill impairments are perceived as timely and whether specific auditor characteristics affect the perceived timeliness. It therefore contributes to central questions in accounting research: is managerial discretion over accounting numbers (accounting choice) good or bad for stakeholders and does audit quality have an impact on this relationship? It is motivated by the IASB's post‐implementation review on business combinations and the Goodwill and Impairment project based on it, the ongoing debate on the decision usefulness of impairment testing, and the question whether auditors have an impact on firms’ reporting of impairment losses. Based on a sample of German listed firms for the period 2006 to 2013, the results indicate that goodwill impairments are not recognized in a timely manner and delayed by at least one to two years. Moreover, the findings suggest that the recognition of impairment losses is influenced by auditor characteristics. In particular, firms seem to report goodwill impairments in a more timely fashion when they are audited by a Big 4 auditor, whereas the timeliness seems to decrease with a higher non‐audit fee ratio and a longer auditor tenure. Moreover, additional analyses indicate that higher audit fees lead to more timely impairments.

Freie Schlagworte: Accounting choice, Audit quality, Auditor characteristics, Conservatism, Goodwill impairments, Timeliness
Status: Verlagsversion
URN: urn:nbn:de:tuda-tuprints-177936
Zusätzliche Informationen:

The authors gratefully acknowledge the comments and suggestions of Christian Friedrich, Stewart Jones, David Lont, and the participants of the 6th Workshop on Audit Quality.

Sachgruppe der Dewey Dezimalklassifikatin (DDC): 300 Sozialwissenschaften > 330 Wirtschaft
Fachbereich(e)/-gebiet(e): 01 Fachbereich Rechts- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften
01 Fachbereich Rechts- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften > Betriebswirtschaftliche Fachgebiete
01 Fachbereich Rechts- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften > Betriebswirtschaftliche Fachgebiete > Fachgebiet Rechnungswesen, Controlling und Wirtschaftsprüfung
Hinterlegungsdatum: 14 Nov 2023 14:10
Letzte Änderung: 19 Jul 2024 10:13
PPN:
Export:
Suche nach Titel in: TUfind oder in Google

Verfügbare Versionen dieses Eintrags

Frage zum Eintrag Frage zum Eintrag

Optionen (nur für Redakteure)
Redaktionelle Details anzeigen Redaktionelle Details anzeigen