Schnaubelt, Erik ; De Gersem, Herbert ; Marsic, Nicolas (2023)
Comparison of 2.5D finite element formulations with perfectly matched layers for solving open axisymmetric electromagnetic cavity problems.
In: International Journal of Numerical Modelling: Electronic Networks, Devices and Fields, 2023, 36 (3)
doi: 10.26083/tuprints-00023684
Artikel, Zweitveröffentlichung, Verlagsversion
Es ist eine neuere Version dieses Eintrags verfügbar. |
Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract)
Axial symmetry in time‐harmonic electromagnetic wave problems can be exploited by considering a Fourier expansion along the angular direction, reducing fully three‐dimensional computations to two‐dimensional ones on an azimuthal cross section. While this transition leads to a significant decrease in computational effort, it introduces additional difficulties, which necessitate appropriate finite element (FE) formulations. By combining the latter with perfectly matched layers (PML), open problems can be considered. In this work, we compare and discuss the performance of different combinations of axisymmetric FE formulations and PMLs, using a dielectric sphere in open space as a test case. As an application example, a superconducting Fabry–Pérot photon trap is considered.
Typ des Eintrags: | Artikel |
---|---|
Erschienen: | 2023 |
Autor(en): | Schnaubelt, Erik ; De Gersem, Herbert ; Marsic, Nicolas |
Art des Eintrags: | Zweitveröffentlichung |
Titel: | Comparison of 2.5D finite element formulations with perfectly matched layers for solving open axisymmetric electromagnetic cavity problems |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Publikationsjahr: | 14 November 2023 |
Ort: | Darmstadt |
Publikationsdatum der Erstveröffentlichung: | 2023 |
Ort der Erstveröffentlichung: | Chichester |
Verlag: | John Wiley & Sons |
Titel der Zeitschrift, Zeitung oder Schriftenreihe: | International Journal of Numerical Modelling: Electronic Networks, Devices and Fields |
Jahrgang/Volume einer Zeitschrift: | 36 |
(Heft-)Nummer: | 3 |
Kollation: | 13 Seiten |
DOI: | 10.26083/tuprints-00023684 |
URL / URN: | https://tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/23684 |
Zugehörige Links: | |
Herkunft: | Zweitveröffentlichung DeepGreen |
Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract): | Axial symmetry in time‐harmonic electromagnetic wave problems can be exploited by considering a Fourier expansion along the angular direction, reducing fully three‐dimensional computations to two‐dimensional ones on an azimuthal cross section. While this transition leads to a significant decrease in computational effort, it introduces additional difficulties, which necessitate appropriate finite element (FE) formulations. By combining the latter with perfectly matched layers (PML), open problems can be considered. In this work, we compare and discuss the performance of different combinations of axisymmetric FE formulations and PMLs, using a dielectric sphere in open space as a test case. As an application example, a superconducting Fabry–Pérot photon trap is considered. |
Freie Schlagworte: | 2.5D, axisymmetry, electromagnetism, finite element method, perfectly matched layers, quasi‐3D, wave problems |
ID-Nummer: | e3073 |
Status: | Verlagsversion |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:tuda-tuprints-236848 |
Zusätzliche Informationen: | Special Issue: The 12th International Symposium on Electric and Magnetic Fields (EMF 2021) |
Sachgruppe der Dewey Dezimalklassifikatin (DDC): | 600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 621.3 Elektrotechnik, Elektronik |
Fachbereich(e)/-gebiet(e): | 18 Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik 18 Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik > Institut für Teilchenbeschleunigung und Theorie Elektromagnetische Felder |
Hinterlegungsdatum: | 14 Nov 2023 14:12 |
Letzte Änderung: | 15 Nov 2023 08:28 |
PPN: | |
Export: | |
Suche nach Titel in: | TUfind oder in Google |
Verfügbare Versionen dieses Eintrags
- Comparison of 2.5D finite element formulations with perfectly matched layers for solving open axisymmetric electromagnetic cavity problems. (deposited 14 Nov 2023 14:12) [Gegenwärtig angezeigt]
Frage zum Eintrag |
Optionen (nur für Redakteure)
Redaktionelle Details anzeigen |