Müller, C. ; Klein, A. ; Wegner, F. ; Kuipers, M. (2007)
Costs and Performance of Non-Cooperative Relay Networks.
13th European Wireless Conference. Paris, France (01.-04.04.2007)
Konferenzveröffentlichung, Bibliographie
Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract)
Two promising types of networks exist for future wireless cellular networks. The first one is a conventional network (CNT) in which a subscriber station (SS) is directly connected to a base station (BS). The other one is a relay network (RNT). In the considered RNT, a SS is directly connected to a BS or connected to a BS by using a relay station (RS). In this paper, different layouts of a RNT are compared with a CNT in an urban scenario modeled by a Manhattan grid. Two protocols are considered in the RNT, namely a non-cooperative amplify-and-forward and a non- cooperative decode-and-forward protocol. The comparison is based on a physical layer taken from IEEE 802.16 standard. Each network is analyzed separately in the same service area. The bits per second which can be transmitted per cost unit in the considered service area are determined for each type of network. The networks are compared by a cost model introduced in this paper. The costs of a RS are assumed to be a fraction of the costs of a BS. The maximum costs of a RS in relation to the costs of a BS are determined for which a RNT is more cost-efficient than a CNT. It is shown that, depending on the layout of the RNT, a RS may cost up to 6% of the costs of a BS.
| Typ des Eintrags: | Konferenzveröffentlichung |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: | 2007 |
| Autor(en): | Müller, C. ; Klein, A. ; Wegner, F. ; Kuipers, M. |
| Art des Eintrags: | Bibliographie |
| Titel: | Costs and Performance of Non-Cooperative Relay Networks |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Publikationsjahr: | April 2007 |
| Veranstaltungstitel: | 13th European Wireless Conference |
| Veranstaltungsort: | Paris, France |
| Veranstaltungsdatum: | 01.-04.04.2007 |
| Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract): | Two promising types of networks exist for future wireless cellular networks. The first one is a conventional network (CNT) in which a subscriber station (SS) is directly connected to a base station (BS). The other one is a relay network (RNT). In the considered RNT, a SS is directly connected to a BS or connected to a BS by using a relay station (RS). In this paper, different layouts of a RNT are compared with a CNT in an urban scenario modeled by a Manhattan grid. Two protocols are considered in the RNT, namely a non-cooperative amplify-and-forward and a non- cooperative decode-and-forward protocol. The comparison is based on a physical layer taken from IEEE 802.16 standard. Each network is analyzed separately in the same service area. The bits per second which can be transmitted per cost unit in the considered service area are determined for each type of network. The networks are compared by a cost model introduced in this paper. The costs of a RS are assumed to be a fraction of the costs of a BS. The maximum costs of a RS in relation to the costs of a BS are determined for which a RNT is more cost-efficient than a CNT. It is shown that, depending on the layout of the RNT, a RS may cost up to 6% of the costs of a BS. |
| Fachbereich(e)/-gebiet(e): | 18 Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik 18 Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik > Institut für Nachrichtentechnik 18 Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik > Institut für Nachrichtentechnik > Kommunikationstechnik |
| Hinterlegungsdatum: | 12 Jul 2023 08:21 |
| Letzte Änderung: | 12 Jul 2023 08:21 |
| PPN: | |
| Export: | |
| Suche nach Titel in: | TUfind oder in Google |
 |
Frage zum Eintrag |
Optionen (nur für Redakteure)
 |
Redaktionelle Details anzeigen |
Drucken
Impressum