Glockner, Max ; Hou, Yufang ; Gurevych, Iryna (2022)
Missing Counter-Evidence Renders NLP Fact-Checking Unrealistic for Misinformation.
2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (07.12.2022-11.12.2022)
Konferenzveröffentlichung, Bibliographie

Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract)

Misinformation emerges in times of uncertainty when credible information is limited. This is challenging for NLP-based fact-checking as it relies on counter-evidence, which may not yet be available. Despite increasing interest in automatic fact-checking, it is still unclear if automated approaches can realistically refute harmful real-world misinformation. Here, we contrast and compare NLP fact-checking with how professional fact-checkers combat misinformation in the absence of counter-evidence. In our analysis, we show that, by design, existing NLP task definitions for fact-checking cannot refute misinformation as professional fact-checkers do for the majority of claims. We then define two requirements that the evidence in datasets must fulfill for realistic fact-checking: It must be (1) sufficient to refute the claim and (2) not leaked from existing fact-checking articles. We survey existing fact-checking datasets and find that all of them fail to satisfy both criteria. Finally, we perform experiments to demonstrate that models trained on a large-scale fact-checking dataset rely on leaked evidence, which makes them unsuitable in real-world scenarios. Taken together, we show that current NLP fact-checking cannot realistically combat real-world misinformation because it depends on unrealistic assumptions about counter-evidence in the data.

Frage zum Eintrag

Redaktionelle Details anzeigen