TU Darmstadt / ULB / TUbiblio

Phase sensitivity of gain-unbalanced nonlinear interferometers

Giese, Enno ; Lemieux, Samuel ; Manceau, Mathieu ; Fickler, Robert ; Boyd, Robert W. (2017)
Phase sensitivity of gain-unbalanced nonlinear interferometers.
In: Physical Review A, 96 (5)
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.96.053863
Artikel, Bibliographie

Dies ist die neueste Version dieses Eintrags.

Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract)

The phase uncertainty of an unseeded nonlinear interferometer, where the output of one nonlinear crystal is transmitted to the input of a second crystal that analyzes it, is commonly said to be below the shot-noise level but highly dependent on detection and internal loss. Unbalancing the gains of the first (source) and second (analyzer) crystals leads to a configuration that is tolerant against detection loss. However, in terms of sensitivity, there is no advantage in choosing a stronger analyzer over a stronger source, and hence the comparison to a shot-noise level is not straightforward. Internal loss breaks this symmetry and shows that it is crucial whether the source or analyzer is dominating. Based on these results, claiming a Heisenberg scaling of the sensitivity is more subtle than in a balanced setup

Typ des Eintrags: Artikel
Erschienen: 2017
Autor(en): Giese, Enno ; Lemieux, Samuel ; Manceau, Mathieu ; Fickler, Robert ; Boyd, Robert W.
Art des Eintrags: Bibliographie
Titel: Phase sensitivity of gain-unbalanced nonlinear interferometers
Sprache: Englisch
Publikationsjahr: 29 November 2017
Ort: Woodbury, NY
Verlag: APS Physics
Titel der Zeitschrift, Zeitung oder Schriftenreihe: Physical Review A
Jahrgang/Volume einer Zeitschrift: 96
(Heft-)Nummer: 5
Kollation: 10 Seiten
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.96.053863
URL / URN: https://journals.aps.org/pra/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevA.96.05...
Zugehörige Links:
Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract):

The phase uncertainty of an unseeded nonlinear interferometer, where the output of one nonlinear crystal is transmitted to the input of a second crystal that analyzes it, is commonly said to be below the shot-noise level but highly dependent on detection and internal loss. Unbalancing the gains of the first (source) and second (analyzer) crystals leads to a configuration that is tolerant against detection loss. However, in terms of sensitivity, there is no advantage in choosing a stronger analyzer over a stronger source, and hence the comparison to a shot-noise level is not straightforward. Internal loss breaks this symmetry and shows that it is crucial whether the source or analyzer is dominating. Based on these results, claiming a Heisenberg scaling of the sensitivity is more subtle than in a balanced setup

Fachbereich(e)/-gebiet(e): 05 Fachbereich Physik
05 Fachbereich Physik > Institut für Angewandte Physik
05 Fachbereich Physik > Institut für Angewandte Physik > Theoretische Quantenoptik
05 Fachbereich Physik > Institut für Angewandte Physik > Theoretische Quantenphysik
Hinterlegungsdatum: 07 Jul 2022 09:55
Letzte Änderung: 05 Sep 2024 08:10
PPN: 503609641
Export:
Suche nach Titel in: TUfind oder in Google

Verfügbare Versionen dieses Eintrags

Frage zum Eintrag Frage zum Eintrag

Optionen (nur für Redakteure)
Redaktionelle Details anzeigen Redaktionelle Details anzeigen