Neumüller, Ulrich ; Burger, Hannah ; Krausch, Sabrina ; Blüthgen, Nico ; Ayasse, Manfred (2020)
Interactions of local habitat type, landscape composition and flower availability moderate wild bee communities.
In: Landscape Ecology, 35 (10)
doi: 10.1007/s10980-020-01096-4
Artikel, Bibliographie
Dies ist die neueste Version dieses Eintrags.
Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract)
Context: Landscape and local habitat traits moderate wild bee communities. However, whether landscape effects differ between local habitat types is largely unknown.
Objectives: We explored the way that wild bee communities in three distinct habitats are shaped by landscape composition and the availability of flowering plants by evaluating divergences in response patterns between habitats.
Methods: In a large-scale monitoring project across 20 research areas, wild bee data were collected on three habitats: near-natural grassland, established flower plantings and residual habitats (e.g. field margins). Additionally, landscape composition was mapped around the research areas.
Results: Our monitoring produced a dataset of 27,650 bees belonging to 324 species. Bee communities on all three habitats reacted similarly to local flower availability. Intensively managed grassland in the surrounding landscape had an overall negative effect on the studied habitats. Other landscape variables produced diverging response patterns that were particularly pronounced during early and late season. Bee communities in near-natural grassland showed a strong positive response to ruderal areas. Flower plantings and residual habitats such as field margins showed a pronounced positive response to extensively managed grassland and woodland edges. Response patterns regarding bee abundance were consistent with those found for species richness.
Conclusion: We advise the consideration of local habitat type and seasonality when assessing the effect of landscape context on bee communities. A reduction in the intensity of grassland management enhances bee diversity in a broad range of habitats. Moreover, wild bee communities are promoted by habitat types such as ruderal areas or woodland edges.
| Typ des Eintrags: | Artikel |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: | 2020 |
| Autor(en): | Neumüller, Ulrich ; Burger, Hannah ; Krausch, Sabrina ; Blüthgen, Nico ; Ayasse, Manfred |
| Art des Eintrags: | Bibliographie |
| Titel: | Interactions of local habitat type, landscape composition and flower availability moderate wild bee communities |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Publikationsjahr: | August 2020 |
| Ort: | Dordrecht |
| Verlag: | Springer Science |
| Titel der Zeitschrift, Zeitung oder Schriftenreihe: | Landscape Ecology |
| Jahrgang/Volume einer Zeitschrift: | 35 |
| (Heft-)Nummer: | 10 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s10980-020-01096-4 |
| URL / URN: | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01096-4 |
| Zugehörige Links: | |
| Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract): | Context: Landscape and local habitat traits moderate wild bee communities. However, whether landscape effects differ between local habitat types is largely unknown. Objectives: We explored the way that wild bee communities in three distinct habitats are shaped by landscape composition and the availability of flowering plants by evaluating divergences in response patterns between habitats. Methods: In a large-scale monitoring project across 20 research areas, wild bee data were collected on three habitats: near-natural grassland, established flower plantings and residual habitats (e.g. field margins). Additionally, landscape composition was mapped around the research areas. Results: Our monitoring produced a dataset of 27,650 bees belonging to 324 species. Bee communities on all three habitats reacted similarly to local flower availability. Intensively managed grassland in the surrounding landscape had an overall negative effect on the studied habitats. Other landscape variables produced diverging response patterns that were particularly pronounced during early and late season. Bee communities in near-natural grassland showed a strong positive response to ruderal areas. Flower plantings and residual habitats such as field margins showed a pronounced positive response to extensively managed grassland and woodland edges. Response patterns regarding bee abundance were consistent with those found for species richness. Conclusion: We advise the consideration of local habitat type and seasonality when assessing the effect of landscape context on bee communities. A reduction in the intensity of grassland management enhances bee diversity in a broad range of habitats. Moreover, wild bee communities are promoted by habitat types such as ruderal areas or woodland edges. |
| Freie Schlagworte: | Wild bee, Landscape composition, Grassland, Pollination, Flower planting |
| Fachbereich(e)/-gebiet(e): | 10 Fachbereich Biologie 10 Fachbereich Biologie > Ecological Networks |
| Hinterlegungsdatum: | 10 Sep 2020 05:25 |
| Letzte Änderung: | 19 Dez 2024 11:09 |
| PPN: | 524850712 |
| Export: | |
| Suche nach Titel in: | TUfind oder in Google |
Verfügbare Versionen dieses Eintrags
-
Interactions of local habitat type, landscape composition and flower availability moderate wild bee communities. (deposited 18 Dez 2024 12:39)
- Interactions of local habitat type, landscape composition and flower availability moderate wild bee communities. (deposited 10 Sep 2020 05:25) [Gegenwärtig angezeigt]
 |
Frage zum Eintrag |
Optionen (nur für Redakteure)
 |
Redaktionelle Details anzeigen |
Drucken
Impressum