Selk, Veith (2013)
Resisto, ergo sum! Anmerkungen zur Begriffsgeschichte von "Widerstand".
In: Peripherie. Zeitschrift für Politik und Ökonomie in der Dritten Welt, 33 (129)
Artikel, Bibliographie
Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract)
Based on a conceptual history approach and an analysis of some classic texts of political thought, this article investigates the shifts in the meaning of the political concept of „resistance“. It shows that this concept has undergone major changes throughout its history. Firstly, it was transformed during the „Sattelzeit“ (1750-1850). Originally a „reactionary“ term, it became a broader more „progressive“ concept which could be used more easily as an instrument of political mobilization and ideological contestation. It also started to refl ect the modern concept of time as processing history. Secondly, in the subsequent period (since 1850), the concept of „resistance“ became romanticised, individualised, culturalised and subjectivised. As a result, it became a diffused concept. Finally, the closing section of the paper examines contemporary tendencies toward the depoliticization and aestheticization of „resistance“.
| Typ des Eintrags: | Artikel |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: | 2013 |
| Autor(en): | Selk, Veith |
| Art des Eintrags: | Bibliographie |
| Titel: | Resisto, ergo sum! Anmerkungen zur Begriffsgeschichte von "Widerstand" |
| Sprache: | Deutsch |
| Publikationsjahr: | 2013 |
| Verlag: | Verlag Westfälisches Dampfboot |
| Titel der Zeitschrift, Zeitung oder Schriftenreihe: | Peripherie. Zeitschrift für Politik und Ökonomie in der Dritten Welt |
| Jahrgang/Volume einer Zeitschrift: | 33 |
| (Heft-)Nummer: | 129 |
| URL / URN: | https://budrich-journals.de/index.php/peripherie/article/vie... |
| Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract): | Based on a conceptual history approach and an analysis of some classic texts of political thought, this article investigates the shifts in the meaning of the political concept of „resistance“. It shows that this concept has undergone major changes throughout its history. Firstly, it was transformed during the „Sattelzeit“ (1750-1850). Originally a „reactionary“ term, it became a broader more „progressive“ concept which could be used more easily as an instrument of political mobilization and ideological contestation. It also started to refl ect the modern concept of time as processing history. Secondly, in the subsequent period (since 1850), the concept of „resistance“ became romanticised, individualised, culturalised and subjectivised. As a result, it became a diffused concept. Finally, the closing section of the paper examines contemporary tendencies toward the depoliticization and aestheticization of „resistance“. |
| Fachbereich(e)/-gebiet(e): | 02 Fachbereich Gesellschafts- und Geschichtswissenschaften 02 Fachbereich Gesellschafts- und Geschichtswissenschaften > Institut für Politikwissenschaft 02 Fachbereich Gesellschafts- und Geschichtswissenschaften > Institut für Politikwissenschaft > Politische Theorie und Ideengeschichte |
| Hinterlegungsdatum: | 22 Mai 2019 12:22 |
| Letzte Änderung: | 08 Jan 2020 11:27 |
| PPN: | |
| Export: | |
| Suche nach Titel in: | TUfind oder in Google |
 |
Frage zum Eintrag |
Optionen (nur für Redakteure)
 |
Redaktionelle Details anzeigen |
Drucken
Impressum