Habernal, Ivan ; Hannemann, Raffael ; Pollak, Christian ; Klamm, Christopher ; Pauli, Patrick ; Gurevych, Iryna (2017)
Argotario: Computational Argumentation Meets Serious Games.
Copenhagen, Denmark
Konferenzveröffentlichung, Bibliographie
Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract)
An important skill in critical thinking and argumentation is the ability to spot and recognize fallacies. Fallacious arguments, omnipresent in argumentative discourse, can be deceptive, manipulative, or simply leading to 'wrong moves' in a discussion. Despite their importance, argumentation scholars and NLP researchers with focus on argumentation quality have not yet investigated fallacies empirically. The nonexistence of resources dealing with fallacious argumentation calls for scalable approaches to data acquisition and annotation, for which the serious games methodology offers an appealing, yet unexplored, alternative. We present Argotario, a serious game that deals with fallacies in everyday argumentation. Argotario is a multilingual, open-source, platform-independent application with strong educational aspects, accessible at www.argotario.net.
| Typ des Eintrags: | Konferenzveröffentlichung |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: | 2017 |
| Autor(en): | Habernal, Ivan ; Hannemann, Raffael ; Pollak, Christian ; Klamm, Christopher ; Pauli, Patrick ; Gurevych, Iryna |
| Art des Eintrags: | Bibliographie |
| Titel: | Argotario: Computational Argumentation Meets Serious Games |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Publikationsjahr: | September 2017 |
| Verlag: | Association for Computational Linguistics |
| Buchtitel: | Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations |
| Veranstaltungsort: | Copenhagen, Denmark |
| URL / URN: | http://aclweb.org/anthology/D17-2002 |
| Zugehörige Links: | |
| Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract): | An important skill in critical thinking and argumentation is the ability to spot and recognize fallacies. Fallacious arguments, omnipresent in argumentative discourse, can be deceptive, manipulative, or simply leading to 'wrong moves' in a discussion. Despite their importance, argumentation scholars and NLP researchers with focus on argumentation quality have not yet investigated fallacies empirically. The nonexistence of resources dealing with fallacious argumentation calls for scalable approaches to data acquisition and annotation, for which the serious games methodology offers an appealing, yet unexplored, alternative. We present Argotario, a serious game that deals with fallacies in everyday argumentation. Argotario is a multilingual, open-source, platform-independent application with strong educational aspects, accessible at www.argotario.net. |
| Freie Schlagworte: | UKP_a_ArMin;UKP_p_ArguAna |
| ID-Nummer: | TUD-CS-2017-0155 |
| Fachbereich(e)/-gebiet(e): | 20 Fachbereich Informatik 20 Fachbereich Informatik > Ubiquitäre Wissensverarbeitung DFG-Graduiertenkollegs DFG-Graduiertenkollegs > Graduiertenkolleg 1994 Adaptive Informationsaufbereitung aus heterogenen Quellen |
| Hinterlegungsdatum: | 04 Jul 2017 14:23 |
| Letzte Änderung: | 24 Jan 2020 12:03 |
| PPN: | |
| Export: | |
| Suche nach Titel in: | TUfind oder in Google |
 |
Frage zum Eintrag |
Optionen (nur für Redakteure)
 |
Redaktionelle Details anzeigen |
Drucken
Impressum