Gerber, Nina ; McDermott, Ronja ; Volkamer, Melanie ; Vogt, Joachim (2016)
Understanding information security compliance - Why goal setting and rewards might be a bad idea.
Frankfurt, Germany
Konferenzveröffentlichung, Bibliographie
Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract)
Since organizational information security policies can only improve security if employees comply with them, understanding the factors that affect employee security compliance is crucial for strengthening information security. Based on a survey with 200 German employees, we find that reward for production goal achievement negatively impacts security compliance. Whereas a distinct error aversion culture also seems to impair security compliance, the results provide no evidence for an impact of error management culture, affective commitment towards the organization, security policy information quality or quality of the goal setting process. Furthermore, the intention to comply with security policies turns out to be a bad predictor for actual security compliance. We therefore suggest future studies to measure actual behavior instead of behavioral intention.
Typ des Eintrags: | Konferenzveröffentlichung |
---|---|
Erschienen: | 2016 |
Autor(en): | Gerber, Nina ; McDermott, Ronja ; Volkamer, Melanie ; Vogt, Joachim |
Art des Eintrags: | Bibliographie |
Titel: | Understanding information security compliance - Why goal setting and rewards might be a bad idea |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Publikationsjahr: | Juli 2016 |
Verlag: | University of Plymouth |
Buchtitel: | International Symposium on Human Aspects of Information Security & Assurance (HAISA 2016) |
Band einer Reihe: | 10. |
Veranstaltungsort: | Frankfurt, Germany |
Zugehörige Links: | |
Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract): | Since organizational information security policies can only improve security if employees comply with them, understanding the factors that affect employee security compliance is crucial for strengthening information security. Based on a survey with 200 German employees, we find that reward for production goal achievement negatively impacts security compliance. Whereas a distinct error aversion culture also seems to impair security compliance, the results provide no evidence for an impact of error management culture, affective commitment towards the organization, security policy information quality or quality of the goal setting process. Furthermore, the intention to comply with security policies turns out to be a bad predictor for actual security compliance. We therefore suggest future studies to measure actual behavior instead of behavioral intention. |
Freie Schlagworte: | Security, Usability and Society;Secure Data |
ID-Nummer: | TUD-CS-2016-0134 |
Fachbereich(e)/-gebiet(e): | 20 Fachbereich Informatik > SECUSO - Security, Usability and Society 20 Fachbereich Informatik > Theoretische Informatik - Kryptographie und Computeralgebra LOEWE > LOEWE-Zentren > CASED – Center for Advanced Security Research Darmstadt Profilbereiche > Cybersicherheit (CYSEC) LOEWE > LOEWE-Zentren 20 Fachbereich Informatik Profilbereiche LOEWE |
Hinterlegungsdatum: | 28 Jul 2016 18:35 |
Letzte Änderung: | 30 Mai 2018 12:53 |
PPN: | |
Export: | |
Suche nach Titel in: | TUfind oder in Google |
Frage zum Eintrag |
Optionen (nur für Redakteure)
Redaktionelle Details anzeigen |