TU Darmstadt / ULB / TUbiblio

Checking Timed Bisimulation with Bounded Zone-History Graphs - Technical Report

Luthmann, Lars ; Göttmann, Hendrik ; Lochau, Malte (2019)
Checking Timed Bisimulation with Bounded Zone-History Graphs - Technical Report.
doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1910.08992
Report, Bibliographie

Abstract

Timed automata (TA) are a well-established formalism for specifying discrete-state/continuous-time behavior of time-critical reactive systems. Concerning the fundamental analysis problem of comparing a candidate implementation against a specification, both given as TA, it has been shown that timed trace equivalence is undecidable, whereas timed bisimulation equivalence is decidable. The corresponding proof utilizes region graphs, a finite, but generally very space-consuming characterization of TA semantics. Hence, most practical TA tools utilize zone graphs instead, a symbolic and generally more efficient representation of TA semantics, to automate analysis tasks. However, zone graphs only produce sound results for analysis tasks being reducible to plain reachability problems thus being too imprecise for checking timed bisimilarity. In this paper, we propose bounded zone-history graphs, a novel characterization of TA semantics facilitating an adjustable trade-off between precision and scalability of timed-bisimilarity checking. Our tool TimBrCheck is, to the best of our knowledge, the only currently available tool for effectively checking timed bisimilarity and even supports non-deterministic TA with silent moves. We further present experimental results gained from applying our tool to a collection of community benchmarks, providing insights into trade-offs between precision and efficiency, depending on the bound value.

Item Type: Report
Erschienen: 2019
Creators: Luthmann, Lars ; Göttmann, Hendrik ; Lochau, Malte
Type of entry: Bibliographie
Title: Checking Timed Bisimulation with Bounded Zone-History Graphs - Technical Report
Language: English
Date: 20 October 2019
Publisher: arXiv
Series: Formal Languages and Automata Theory
Edition: 1.Version
DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1910.08992
URL / URN: https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.08992
Abstract:

Timed automata (TA) are a well-established formalism for specifying discrete-state/continuous-time behavior of time-critical reactive systems. Concerning the fundamental analysis problem of comparing a candidate implementation against a specification, both given as TA, it has been shown that timed trace equivalence is undecidable, whereas timed bisimulation equivalence is decidable. The corresponding proof utilizes region graphs, a finite, but generally very space-consuming characterization of TA semantics. Hence, most practical TA tools utilize zone graphs instead, a symbolic and generally more efficient representation of TA semantics, to automate analysis tasks. However, zone graphs only produce sound results for analysis tasks being reducible to plain reachability problems thus being too imprecise for checking timed bisimilarity. In this paper, we propose bounded zone-history graphs, a novel characterization of TA semantics facilitating an adjustable trade-off between precision and scalability of timed-bisimilarity checking. Our tool TimBrCheck is, to the best of our knowledge, the only currently available tool for effectively checking timed bisimilarity and even supports non-deterministic TA with silent moves. We further present experimental results gained from applying our tool to a collection of community benchmarks, providing insights into trade-offs between precision and efficiency, depending on the bound value.

Divisions: 18 Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology
18 Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology > Institute of Computer Engineering > Real-Time Systems
18 Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology > Institute of Computer Engineering
Date Deposited: 28 Oct 2019 08:46
Last Modified: 11 Aug 2023 08:05
PPN:
Export:
Suche nach Titel in: TUfind oder in Google
Send an inquiry Send an inquiry

Options (only for editors)
Show editorial Details Show editorial Details