TU Darmstadt / ULB / TUbiblio

A Vulnerability in RSA Implementations due to Instruction Cache Analysis and Its Demonstration on OpenSSL

Aciicmez, Onur ; Schindler, Werner
ed.: Malkin, T. (2008)
A Vulnerability in RSA Implementations due to Instruction Cache Analysis and Its Demonstration on OpenSSL.
Berlin
Conference or Workshop Item, Bibliographie

Abstract

MicroArchitectural Analysis (MA) techniques, more specifically Simple Branch Prediction Analysis (SBPA) and Instruction Cache Analysis, have the potential of disclosing the entire execution ow of a software-implemented cryptosystem ([5, 2]). In this paper we will show that one can completely break RSA in the original unpatched OpenSSL version (v.0.9.8e) even if the most secure configuration is in place, including all countermeasures against side-channel and MicroArchitectural analysis (in particular, base blinding). We also discuss (known) countermeasures that prevent this attack. In a first step we apply an instruction cache attack to reveal which Montgomery operations require extra reductions. To exploit this information we model the timing behavior of the modular exponentiation algorithm by a stochastic process. Its analysis provides the optimal guessing strategy, which reveals the secret key ( mod p1) and finally the factorization of the RSA modulus n = p1p2. For the instruction cache attack we applied a spy process that was embedded in the target process (OpenSSL), which clearly facilitates the experimental part. This simplifiation yet does not nullify our results since in cache attacks empirical results from embedded spy processes and (suitably implemented) stand-alone spy processes are very close to each other [16] and, moreover, our guessing strategy is fault-tolerant. Interestingly, the second step of our attack is related to that of a particular combined power and timing attack on smart cards [23] (see also [27, 22]). Before we published our result [1] we informed the OpenSSL development team who included a patch into the stable branch of v.0.9.7e ([31, 32]) and CERT which informed software vendors ([33{35]). In particular, this countermeasure is included in the current version 0.9.8f. We have only analyzed OpenSSL, thus we currently do not know the strength of other cryptographic libraries.

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item
Erschienen: 2008
Editors: Malkin, T.
Creators: Aciicmez, Onur ; Schindler, Werner
Type of entry: Bibliographie
Title: A Vulnerability in RSA Implementations due to Instruction Cache Analysis and Its Demonstration on OpenSSL
Language: German
Date: April 2008
Publisher: Springer
Issue Number: 4964
Book Title: Topics in Cryptology, CT-RSA
Series: LNCS
Event Location: Berlin
Abstract:

MicroArchitectural Analysis (MA) techniques, more specifically Simple Branch Prediction Analysis (SBPA) and Instruction Cache Analysis, have the potential of disclosing the entire execution ow of a software-implemented cryptosystem ([5, 2]). In this paper we will show that one can completely break RSA in the original unpatched OpenSSL version (v.0.9.8e) even if the most secure configuration is in place, including all countermeasures against side-channel and MicroArchitectural analysis (in particular, base blinding). We also discuss (known) countermeasures that prevent this attack. In a first step we apply an instruction cache attack to reveal which Montgomery operations require extra reductions. To exploit this information we model the timing behavior of the modular exponentiation algorithm by a stochastic process. Its analysis provides the optimal guessing strategy, which reveals the secret key ( mod p1) and finally the factorization of the RSA modulus n = p1p2. For the instruction cache attack we applied a spy process that was embedded in the target process (OpenSSL), which clearly facilitates the experimental part. This simplifiation yet does not nullify our results since in cache attacks empirical results from embedded spy processes and (suitably implemented) stand-alone spy processes are very close to each other [16] and, moreover, our guessing strategy is fault-tolerant. Interestingly, the second step of our attack is related to that of a particular combined power and timing attack on smart cards [23] (see also [27, 22]). Before we published our result [1] we informed the OpenSSL development team who included a patch into the stable branch of v.0.9.7e ([31, 32]) and CERT which informed software vendors ([33{35]). In particular, this countermeasure is included in the current version 0.9.8f. We have only analyzed OpenSSL, thus we currently do not know the strength of other cryptographic libraries.

Uncontrolled Keywords: Secure Things;RSA, Montgomery Multiplication, Instruction-Cache Attack, MicroArchitectural Analysis, Side Channel Analysis, Stochastic Process
Identification Number: TUD-CS-2008-11475
Divisions: LOEWE > LOEWE-Zentren > CASED – Center for Advanced Security Research Darmstadt
LOEWE > LOEWE-Zentren
LOEWE
Date Deposited: 30 Dec 2016 20:23
Last Modified: 17 May 2018 13:02
PPN:
Export:
Suche nach Titel in: TUfind oder in Google
Send an inquiry Send an inquiry

Options (only for editors)
Show editorial Details Show editorial Details