TU Darmstadt / ULB / TUbiblio

How glider pilots misread the FLARM collision alerting display: A laboratory study

Santel, Christoph G. ; Gerber, Paul ; Mehringskötter, Simon ; Schochlow, Verena ; Vogt, Joachim ; Klingauf, Uwe (2014)
How glider pilots misread the FLARM collision alerting display: A laboratory study.
In: Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors, 4 (2)
Artikel, Bibliographie

Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract)

During the last decade glider pilots have been provided with new tools to assist them in their task of seeing and avoiding other traffic; low-cost collision alerting systems (CASs). However, the display of the popular FLARM CAS lacks clues about the system's limitations. To analyze whether glider pilots are aware of these limitations a laboratory study with 43 glider pilot participants was performed. The results show that errors in the initial search direction for traffic increase whenever the aircraft does not fly straight & level. These errors are attributed to a false understanding of the system's indications. Three recommendations are made with the goal of reducing future misinterpretations when using the system.

Typ des Eintrags: Artikel
Erschienen: 2014
Autor(en): Santel, Christoph G. ; Gerber, Paul ; Mehringskötter, Simon ; Schochlow, Verena ; Vogt, Joachim ; Klingauf, Uwe
Art des Eintrags: Bibliographie
Titel: How glider pilots misread the FLARM collision alerting display: A laboratory study
Sprache: Englisch
Publikationsjahr: 2014
Titel der Zeitschrift, Zeitung oder Schriftenreihe: Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors
Jahrgang/Volume einer Zeitschrift: 4
(Heft-)Nummer: 2
Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract):

During the last decade glider pilots have been provided with new tools to assist them in their task of seeing and avoiding other traffic; low-cost collision alerting systems (CASs). However, the display of the popular FLARM CAS lacks clues about the system's limitations. To analyze whether glider pilots are aware of these limitations a laboratory study with 43 glider pilot participants was performed. The results show that errors in the initial search direction for traffic increase whenever the aircraft does not fly straight & level. These errors are attributed to a false understanding of the system's indications. Three recommendations are made with the goal of reducing future misinterpretations when using the system.

Freie Schlagworte: See and Avoid, Visual Flight Rules, Collision Alerting Systems, Gliding, FLARM
Fachbereich(e)/-gebiet(e): 16 Fachbereich Maschinenbau
16 Fachbereich Maschinenbau > Fachgebiet für Flugsysteme und Regelungstechnik (FSR)
Hinterlegungsdatum: 01 Nov 2017 09:34
Letzte Änderung: 01 Nov 2017 09:34
PPN:
Export:
Suche nach Titel in: TUfind oder in Google
Frage zum Eintrag Frage zum Eintrag

Optionen (nur für Redakteure)
Redaktionelle Details anzeigen Redaktionelle Details anzeigen