TU Darmstadt / ULB / TUbiblio

A comparative study of flow regimes and thermal performance between flat plate pulsating heat pipe and capillary tube pulsating heat pipe

Takawale, Anand ; Abraham, Satyanand ; Sielaff, Axel ; Mahapatra, Pallab Sinha ; Pattamatta, Arvind ; Stephan, Peter (2019)
A comparative study of flow regimes and thermal performance between flat plate pulsating heat pipe and capillary tube pulsating heat pipe.
In: Applied Thermal Engineering, 149
doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.11.119
Artikel, Bibliographie

Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract)

This paper reports the results of an experimental study to investigate the performance comparison between two Pulsating Heat Pipes namely, a Flat Plate Pulsating Heat Pipe (FPPHP) and a Capillary Tube Pulsating Heat Pipe (CTPHP). The comparison is made based on the flow regimes and the corresponding thermal performances at heat inputs varying from 20 W to 180 W with filling ratios of 40, 60, and 80. Experiments are performed in the vertical bottom heating mode with ethanol as the working fluid. The pressure inside the PHPs and temperatures at the evaporator and condenser region are measured along with a recording of the internal flow regimes using a high-speed camera. Slug-plug flow is observed to be the dominant flow regime in both the PHPs. However, the amplitude of oscillations is found to be higher in CTPHP as compared to FPPHP. The reduction in thermal resistance of FPPHP and CTPHP due to the presence of working fluid is about 83 and 35 of the corresponding thermal resistances without any working fluid respectively. CTPHP shows better thermal performance than FPPHP due to the presence of lateral conduction arising in the latter which has a detrimental effect on the slug-plug oscillations.

Typ des Eintrags: Artikel
Erschienen: 2019
Autor(en): Takawale, Anand ; Abraham, Satyanand ; Sielaff, Axel ; Mahapatra, Pallab Sinha ; Pattamatta, Arvind ; Stephan, Peter
Art des Eintrags: Bibliographie
Titel: A comparative study of flow regimes and thermal performance between flat plate pulsating heat pipe and capillary tube pulsating heat pipe
Sprache: Englisch
Publikationsjahr: 2019
Titel der Zeitschrift, Zeitung oder Schriftenreihe: Applied Thermal Engineering
Jahrgang/Volume einer Zeitschrift: 149
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.11.119
URL / URN: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.11.119
Zugehörige Links:
Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract):

This paper reports the results of an experimental study to investigate the performance comparison between two Pulsating Heat Pipes namely, a Flat Plate Pulsating Heat Pipe (FPPHP) and a Capillary Tube Pulsating Heat Pipe (CTPHP). The comparison is made based on the flow regimes and the corresponding thermal performances at heat inputs varying from 20 W to 180 W with filling ratios of 40, 60, and 80. Experiments are performed in the vertical bottom heating mode with ethanol as the working fluid. The pressure inside the PHPs and temperatures at the evaporator and condenser region are measured along with a recording of the internal flow regimes using a high-speed camera. Slug-plug flow is observed to be the dominant flow regime in both the PHPs. However, the amplitude of oscillations is found to be higher in CTPHP as compared to FPPHP. The reduction in thermal resistance of FPPHP and CTPHP due to the presence of working fluid is about 83 and 35 of the corresponding thermal resistances without any working fluid respectively. CTPHP shows better thermal performance than FPPHP due to the presence of lateral conduction arising in the latter which has a detrimental effect on the slug-plug oscillations.

Freie Schlagworte: Thermal performance, Pulsating heat pipe, Flat plate pulsating heat pipe, Capillary tube pulsating heat pipe
Fachbereich(e)/-gebiet(e): 16 Fachbereich Maschinenbau
16 Fachbereich Maschinenbau > Fachgebiet für Technische Thermodynamik (TTD)
Profilbereiche
Profilbereiche > Thermo-Fluids & Interfaces
Hinterlegungsdatum: 19 Dez 2018 10:22
Letzte Änderung: 08 Aug 2019 07:34
PPN:
Zugehörige Links:
Export:
Suche nach Titel in: TUfind oder in Google
Frage zum Eintrag Frage zum Eintrag

Optionen (nur für Redakteure)
Redaktionelle Details anzeigen Redaktionelle Details anzeigen