TU Darmstadt / ULB / TUbiblio

Implementation and Evaluation of the EasyVote Tallying Component and Ballot

Budurushi, Jurlind ; Renaud, Karen ; Volkamer, Melanie ; Woide, Marcel
Hrsg.: Krimmer, Robert ; Volkamer, Melanie (2014)
Implementation and Evaluation of the EasyVote Tallying Component and Ballot.
Lochau
doi: 10.1109/EVOTE.2014.7001140
Konferenzveröffentlichung, Bibliographie

Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract)

The German federal constitutional court ruled, in 2009, that elections had to have a public nature. EasyVote, a promising hybrid electronic voting system for conducting elections with complex voting rules and huge ballots, meets this requirement. Two assumptions need to hold, however. The first is that voters will verify the human-readable part of the EasyVote ballot and detect discrepancies. Secondly, that electoral officials will act to verify that the human-readable part of the ballot is identical to the machine-readable part, and that they, too, will detect discrepancies. The first assumption was tested in prior work, so in this paper we examine the viability of the second assumption. 

Typ des Eintrags: Konferenzveröffentlichung
Erschienen: 2014
Herausgeber: Krimmer, Robert ; Volkamer, Melanie
Autor(en): Budurushi, Jurlind ; Renaud, Karen ; Volkamer, Melanie ; Woide, Marcel
Art des Eintrags: Bibliographie
Titel: Implementation and Evaluation of the EasyVote Tallying Component and Ballot
Sprache: Englisch
Publikationsjahr: Oktober 2014
Verlag: IEEE
Buchtitel: 6th International Conference on Electronic Voting (EVOTE)
Veranstaltungsort: Lochau
DOI: 10.1109/EVOTE.2014.7001140
Zugehörige Links:
Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract):

The German federal constitutional court ruled, in 2009, that elections had to have a public nature. EasyVote, a promising hybrid electronic voting system for conducting elections with complex voting rules and huge ballots, meets this requirement. Two assumptions need to hold, however. The first is that voters will verify the human-readable part of the EasyVote ballot and detect discrepancies. Secondly, that electoral officials will act to verify that the human-readable part of the ballot is identical to the machine-readable part, and that they, too, will detect discrepancies. The first assumption was tested in prior work, so in this paper we examine the viability of the second assumption. 

Freie Schlagworte: Security, Usability and Society;Secure Data
ID-Nummer: TUD-CS-2014-0928
Fachbereich(e)/-gebiet(e): 20 Fachbereich Informatik
20 Fachbereich Informatik > Theoretische Informatik - Kryptographie und Computeralgebra
20 Fachbereich Informatik > SECUSO - Security, Usability and Society
Profilbereiche
Profilbereiche > Cybersicherheit (CYSEC)
LOEWE
LOEWE > LOEWE-Zentren
LOEWE > LOEWE-Zentren > CASED – Center for Advanced Security Research Darmstadt
Hinterlegungsdatum: 28 Jul 2016 18:35
Letzte Änderung: 12 Jan 2019 21:21
PPN:
Zugehörige Links:
Export:
Suche nach Titel in: TUfind oder in Google
Frage zum Eintrag Frage zum Eintrag

Optionen (nur für Redakteure)
Redaktionelle Details anzeigen Redaktionelle Details anzeigen