TU Darmstadt / ULB / TUbiblio

Teaching Phishing-Security: Which Way is Best?

Stockhardt, Simon ; Reinheimer, Benjamin ; Volkamer, Melanie ; Mayer, Peter ; Kunz, Alexandra ; Rack, Philipp ; Lehmann, Daniel (2016)
Teaching Phishing-Security: Which Way is Best?
Ghent, Belgium
Konferenzveröffentlichung, Bibliographie

Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract)

Ever more processes of our daily lives are shifting into the digital realm. Consequently, users face a variety of IT-security threats with possibly severe ramifications. It has been shown that technical measures alone are insufficient to counter all threats. For instance, it takes technical measures on average 32 hours before identifying and blocking phishing websites. Therefore, teaching users how to identify malicious websites is of utmost importance, if they are to be protected at all times. A number of ways to deliver the necessary knowledge to users exist. Among the most broadly used are instructor-based, computer-based and text-based training. We compare all three formats in the security context, or to be more precise in the context of anti-phishing training.

Typ des Eintrags: Konferenzveröffentlichung
Erschienen: 2016
Autor(en): Stockhardt, Simon ; Reinheimer, Benjamin ; Volkamer, Melanie ; Mayer, Peter ; Kunz, Alexandra ; Rack, Philipp ; Lehmann, Daniel
Art des Eintrags: Bibliographie
Titel: Teaching Phishing-Security: Which Way is Best?
Sprache: Deutsch
Publikationsjahr: Juni 2016
Verlag: Springer
Buchtitel: 31st International Conference on ICT Systems Security and Privacy Protection (IFIP SEC)
Veranstaltungsort: Ghent, Belgium
Zugehörige Links:
Kurzbeschreibung (Abstract):

Ever more processes of our daily lives are shifting into the digital realm. Consequently, users face a variety of IT-security threats with possibly severe ramifications. It has been shown that technical measures alone are insufficient to counter all threats. For instance, it takes technical measures on average 32 hours before identifying and blocking phishing websites. Therefore, teaching users how to identify malicious websites is of utmost importance, if they are to be protected at all times. A number of ways to deliver the necessary knowledge to users exist. Among the most broadly used are instructor-based, computer-based and text-based training. We compare all three formats in the security context, or to be more precise in the context of anti-phishing training.

Freie Schlagworte: Security, Usability and Society;Secure Data
ID-Nummer: TUD-CS-2016-0057
Fachbereich(e)/-gebiet(e): LOEWE > LOEWE-Zentren > CASED – Center for Advanced Security Research Darmstadt
20 Fachbereich Informatik > SECUSO - Security, Usability and Society
20 Fachbereich Informatik > Theoretische Informatik - Kryptographie und Computeralgebra
Profilbereiche > Cybersicherheit (CYSEC)
LOEWE > LOEWE-Zentren
20 Fachbereich Informatik
Profilbereiche
LOEWE
Hinterlegungsdatum: 28 Jul 2016 18:35
Letzte Änderung: 30 Mai 2018 12:53
PPN:
Zugehörige Links:
Export:
Suche nach Titel in: TUfind oder in Google
Frage zum Eintrag Frage zum Eintrag

Optionen (nur für Redakteure)
Redaktionelle Details anzeigen Redaktionelle Details anzeigen